Correlation Between Goldman Sachs and California Municipal

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Goldman Sachs and California Municipal at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Goldman Sachs and California Municipal into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between Goldman Sachs Real and California Municipal Fund, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Goldman Sachs and California Municipal and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Goldman Sachs with a short position of California Municipal. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Goldman Sachs and California Municipal.

Diversification Opportunities for Goldman Sachs and California Municipal

0.36
  Correlation Coefficient

Weak diversification

The 3 months correlation between Goldman and California is 0.36. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Goldman Sachs Real and California Municipal Fund in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on California Municipal and Goldman Sachs is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Goldman Sachs Real are associated (or correlated) with California Municipal. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of California Municipal has no effect on the direction of Goldman Sachs i.e., Goldman Sachs and California Municipal go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between Goldman Sachs and California Municipal

Assuming the 90 days horizon Goldman Sachs Real is expected to generate 7.56 times more return on investment than California Municipal. However, Goldman Sachs is 7.56 times more volatile than California Municipal Fund. It trades about 0.08 of its potential returns per unit of risk. California Municipal Fund is currently generating about 0.41 per unit of risk. If you would invest  1,309  in Goldman Sachs Real on September 13, 2024 and sell it today you would earn a total of  17.00  from holding Goldman Sachs Real or generate 1.3% return on investment over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionMoves Together 
StrengthVery Weak
Accuracy95.45%
ValuesDaily Returns

Goldman Sachs Real  vs.  California Municipal Fund

 Performance 
       Timeline  
Goldman Sachs Real 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

0 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Very Weak
Over the last 90 days Goldman Sachs Real has generated negative risk-adjusted returns adding no value to fund investors. In spite of fairly strong basic indicators, Goldman Sachs is not utilizing all of its potentials. The current stock price disturbance, may contribute to short-term losses for the investors.
California Municipal 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

2 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Weak
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in California Municipal Fund are ranked lower than 2 (%) of all funds and portfolios of funds over the last 90 days. In spite of fairly strong primary indicators, California Municipal is not utilizing all of its potentials. The current stock price disturbance, may contribute to short-term losses for the investors.

Goldman Sachs and California Municipal Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with Goldman Sachs and California Municipal

The main advantage of trading using opposite Goldman Sachs and California Municipal positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Goldman Sachs position performs unexpectedly, California Municipal can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in California Municipal will offset losses from the drop in California Municipal's long position.
The idea behind Goldman Sachs Real and California Municipal Fund pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Stock Tickers module to use high-impact, comprehensive, and customizable stock tickers that can be easily integrated to any websites.

Other Complementary Tools

Performance Analysis
Check effects of mean-variance optimization against your current asset allocation
Sign In To Macroaxis
Sign in to explore Macroaxis' wealth optimization platform and fintech modules
Financial Widgets
Easily integrated Macroaxis content with over 30 different plug-and-play financial widgets
Transaction History
View history of all your transactions and understand their impact on performance
Portfolio Analyzer
Portfolio analysis module that provides access to portfolio diagnostics and optimization engine