Correlation Between Guggenheim Strategic and Stone Harbor
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Guggenheim Strategic and Stone Harbor at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Guggenheim Strategic and Stone Harbor into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between Guggenheim Strategic Opportunities and Stone Harbor Emerging, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Guggenheim Strategic and Stone Harbor and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Guggenheim Strategic with a short position of Stone Harbor. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Guggenheim Strategic and Stone Harbor.
Diversification Opportunities for Guggenheim Strategic and Stone Harbor
-0.37 | Correlation Coefficient |
Very good diversification
The 3 months correlation between Guggenheim and Stone is -0.37. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Guggenheim Strategic Opportuni and Stone Harbor Emerging in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Stone Harbor Emerging and Guggenheim Strategic is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Guggenheim Strategic Opportunities are associated (or correlated) with Stone Harbor. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Stone Harbor Emerging has no effect on the direction of Guggenheim Strategic i.e., Guggenheim Strategic and Stone Harbor go up and down completely randomly.
Pair Corralation between Guggenheim Strategic and Stone Harbor
Considering the 90-day investment horizon Guggenheim Strategic Opportunities is expected to generate 0.32 times more return on investment than Stone Harbor. However, Guggenheim Strategic Opportunities is 3.15 times less risky than Stone Harbor. It trades about 0.21 of its potential returns per unit of risk. Stone Harbor Emerging is currently generating about -0.04 per unit of risk. If you would invest 1,551 in Guggenheim Strategic Opportunities on August 31, 2024 and sell it today you would earn a total of 29.00 from holding Guggenheim Strategic Opportunities or generate 1.87% return on investment over 90 days.
| Time Period | 3 Months [change] |
| Direction | Moves Against |
| Strength | Insignificant |
| Accuracy | 100.0% |
| Values | Daily Returns |
Guggenheim Strategic Opportuni vs. Stone Harbor Emerging
Performance |
| Timeline |
| Guggenheim Strategic |
| Stone Harbor Emerging |
Guggenheim Strategic and Stone Harbor Volatility Contrast
Predicted Return Density |
| Returns |
Pair Trading with Guggenheim Strategic and Stone Harbor
The main advantage of trading using opposite Guggenheim Strategic and Stone Harbor positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Guggenheim Strategic position performs unexpectedly, Stone Harbor can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Stone Harbor will offset losses from the drop in Stone Harbor's long position.The idea behind Guggenheim Strategic Opportunities and Stone Harbor Emerging pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
| Stone Harbor vs. Virtus Global Multi | Stone Harbor vs. Aberdeen Global IF | Stone Harbor vs. Cushing Mlp Total | Stone Harbor vs. Aberdeen Asia Pacific If |
Check out your portfolio center.Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Idea Breakdown module to analyze constituents of all Macroaxis ideas. Macroaxis investment ideas are predefined, sector-focused investing themes.
Other Complementary Tools
| Theme Ratings Determine theme ratings based on digital equity recommendations. Macroaxis theme ratings are based on combination of fundamental analysis and risk-adjusted market performance | |
| Cryptocurrency Center Build and monitor diversified portfolio of extremely risky digital assets and cryptocurrency | |
| Volatility Analysis Get historical volatility and risk analysis based on latest market data | |
| Commodity Directory Find actively traded commodities issued by global exchanges | |
| Idea Breakdown Analyze constituents of all Macroaxis ideas. Macroaxis investment ideas are predefined, sector-focused investing themes |