Correlation Between Guidepath(r) Managed and Loomis Sayles

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Guidepath(r) Managed and Loomis Sayles at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Guidepath(r) Managed and Loomis Sayles into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between Guidepath Managed Futures and Loomis Sayles Inflation, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Guidepath(r) Managed and Loomis Sayles and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Guidepath(r) Managed with a short position of Loomis Sayles. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Guidepath(r) Managed and Loomis Sayles.

Diversification Opportunities for Guidepath(r) Managed and Loomis Sayles

0.8
  Correlation Coefficient

Very poor diversification

The 3 months correlation between Guidepath(r) and Loomis is 0.8. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Guidepath Managed Futures and Loomis Sayles Inflation in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Loomis Sayles Inflation and Guidepath(r) Managed is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Guidepath Managed Futures are associated (or correlated) with Loomis Sayles. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Loomis Sayles Inflation has no effect on the direction of Guidepath(r) Managed i.e., Guidepath(r) Managed and Loomis Sayles go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between Guidepath(r) Managed and Loomis Sayles

Assuming the 90 days horizon Guidepath Managed Futures is expected to under-perform the Loomis Sayles. In addition to that, Guidepath(r) Managed is 1.96 times more volatile than Loomis Sayles Inflation. It trades about -0.05 of its total potential returns per unit of risk. Loomis Sayles Inflation is currently generating about -0.08 per unit of volatility. If you would invest  972.00  in Loomis Sayles Inflation on August 28, 2024 and sell it today you would lose (14.00) from holding Loomis Sayles Inflation or give up 1.44% of portfolio value over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionMoves Together 
StrengthStrong
Accuracy100.0%
ValuesDaily Returns

Guidepath Managed Futures  vs.  Loomis Sayles Inflation

 Performance 
       Timeline  
Guidepath Managed Futures 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

0 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Very Weak
Over the last 90 days Guidepath Managed Futures has generated negative risk-adjusted returns adding no value to fund investors. In spite of fairly strong technical and fundamental indicators, Guidepath(r) Managed is not utilizing all of its potentials. The current stock price disturbance, may contribute to short-term losses for the investors.
Loomis Sayles Inflation 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

0 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Very Weak
Over the last 90 days Loomis Sayles Inflation has generated negative risk-adjusted returns adding no value to fund investors. In spite of fairly strong basic indicators, Loomis Sayles is not utilizing all of its potentials. The current stock price disturbance, may contribute to short-term losses for the investors.

Guidepath(r) Managed and Loomis Sayles Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with Guidepath(r) Managed and Loomis Sayles

The main advantage of trading using opposite Guidepath(r) Managed and Loomis Sayles positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Guidepath(r) Managed position performs unexpectedly, Loomis Sayles can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Loomis Sayles will offset losses from the drop in Loomis Sayles' long position.
The idea behind Guidepath Managed Futures and Loomis Sayles Inflation pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the AI Portfolio Architect module to use AI to generate optimal portfolios and find profitable investment opportunities.

Other Complementary Tools

Financial Widgets
Easily integrated Macroaxis content with over 30 different plug-and-play financial widgets
Aroon Oscillator
Analyze current equity momentum using Aroon Oscillator and other momentum ratios
Premium Stories
Follow Macroaxis premium stories from verified contributors across different equity types, categories and coverage scope
Price Exposure Probability
Analyze equity upside and downside potential for a given time horizon across multiple markets
Portfolio Holdings
Check your current holdings and cash postion to detemine if your portfolio needs rebalancing