Correlation Between Goldman Sachs and MFS Municipal

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Goldman Sachs and MFS Municipal at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Goldman Sachs and MFS Municipal into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between Goldman Sachs Group and MFS Municipal Income, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Goldman Sachs and MFS Municipal and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Goldman Sachs with a short position of MFS Municipal. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Goldman Sachs and MFS Municipal.

Diversification Opportunities for Goldman Sachs and MFS Municipal

-0.44
  Correlation Coefficient

Very good diversification

The 3 months correlation between Goldman and MFS is -0.44. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Goldman Sachs Group and MFS Municipal Income in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on MFS Municipal Income and Goldman Sachs is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Goldman Sachs Group are associated (or correlated) with MFS Municipal. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of MFS Municipal Income has no effect on the direction of Goldman Sachs i.e., Goldman Sachs and MFS Municipal go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between Goldman Sachs and MFS Municipal

Allowing for the 90-day total investment horizon Goldman Sachs Group is expected to generate 5.14 times more return on investment than MFS Municipal. However, Goldman Sachs is 5.14 times more volatile than MFS Municipal Income. It trades about 0.21 of its potential returns per unit of risk. MFS Municipal Income is currently generating about 0.02 per unit of risk. If you would invest  51,720  in Goldman Sachs Group on August 24, 2024 and sell it today you would earn a total of  7,891  from holding Goldman Sachs Group or generate 15.26% return on investment over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionMoves Against 
StrengthVery Weak
Accuracy100.0%
ValuesDaily Returns

Goldman Sachs Group  vs.  MFS Municipal Income

 Performance 
       Timeline  
Goldman Sachs Group 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

10 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
OK
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Goldman Sachs Group are ranked lower than 10 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. In spite of comparatively unfluctuating basic indicators, Goldman Sachs unveiled solid returns over the last few months and may actually be approaching a breakup point.
MFS Municipal Income 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

0 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Very Weak
Over the last 90 days MFS Municipal Income has generated negative risk-adjusted returns adding no value to investors with long positions. In spite of very healthy technical and fundamental indicators, MFS Municipal is not utilizing all of its potentials. The current stock price disarray, may contribute to short-term losses for the investors.

Goldman Sachs and MFS Municipal Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with Goldman Sachs and MFS Municipal

The main advantage of trading using opposite Goldman Sachs and MFS Municipal positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Goldman Sachs position performs unexpectedly, MFS Municipal can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in MFS Municipal will offset losses from the drop in MFS Municipal's long position.
The idea behind Goldman Sachs Group and MFS Municipal Income pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Headlines Timeline module to stay connected to all market stories and filter out noise. Drill down to analyze hype elasticity.

Other Complementary Tools

Portfolio Anywhere
Track or share privately all of your investments from the convenience of any device
Portfolio Backtesting
Avoid under-diversification and over-optimization by backtesting your portfolios
Commodity Directory
Find actively traded commodities issued by global exchanges
Bond Analysis
Evaluate and analyze corporate bonds as a potential investment for your portfolios.
Volatility Analysis
Get historical volatility and risk analysis based on latest market data