Correlation Between Goldman Sachs and PennantPark Investment

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Goldman Sachs and PennantPark Investment at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Goldman Sachs and PennantPark Investment into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between Goldman Sachs Group and PennantPark Investment, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Goldman Sachs and PennantPark Investment and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Goldman Sachs with a short position of PennantPark Investment. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Goldman Sachs and PennantPark Investment.

Diversification Opportunities for Goldman Sachs and PennantPark Investment

0.68
  Correlation Coefficient

Poor diversification

The 3 months correlation between Goldman and PennantPark is 0.68. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Goldman Sachs Group and PennantPark Investment in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on PennantPark Investment and Goldman Sachs is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Goldman Sachs Group are associated (or correlated) with PennantPark Investment. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of PennantPark Investment has no effect on the direction of Goldman Sachs i.e., Goldman Sachs and PennantPark Investment go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between Goldman Sachs and PennantPark Investment

Allowing for the 90-day total investment horizon Goldman Sachs Group is expected to generate 2.35 times more return on investment than PennantPark Investment. However, Goldman Sachs is 2.35 times more volatile than PennantPark Investment. It trades about 0.21 of its potential returns per unit of risk. PennantPark Investment is currently generating about 0.02 per unit of risk. If you would invest  51,830  in Goldman Sachs Group on August 23, 2024 and sell it today you would earn a total of  7,781  from holding Goldman Sachs Group or generate 15.01% return on investment over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionMoves Together 
StrengthSignificant
Accuracy100.0%
ValuesDaily Returns

Goldman Sachs Group  vs.  PennantPark Investment

 Performance 
       Timeline  
Goldman Sachs Group 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

9 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
OK
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Goldman Sachs Group are ranked lower than 9 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. In spite of comparatively weak basic indicators, Goldman Sachs unveiled solid returns over the last few months and may actually be approaching a breakup point.
PennantPark Investment 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

3 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Insignificant
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in PennantPark Investment are ranked lower than 3 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. In spite of comparatively stable basic indicators, PennantPark Investment is not utilizing all of its potentials. The current stock price uproar, may contribute to short-horizon losses for the private investors.

Goldman Sachs and PennantPark Investment Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with Goldman Sachs and PennantPark Investment

The main advantage of trading using opposite Goldman Sachs and PennantPark Investment positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Goldman Sachs position performs unexpectedly, PennantPark Investment can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in PennantPark Investment will offset losses from the drop in PennantPark Investment's long position.
The idea behind Goldman Sachs Group and PennantPark Investment pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Portfolio Optimization module to compute new portfolio that will generate highest expected return given your specified tolerance for risk.

Other Complementary Tools

Sectors
List of equity sectors categorizing publicly traded companies based on their primary business activities
Competition Analyzer
Analyze and compare many basic indicators for a group of related or unrelated entities
Theme Ratings
Determine theme ratings based on digital equity recommendations. Macroaxis theme ratings are based on combination of fundamental analysis and risk-adjusted market performance
Top Crypto Exchanges
Search and analyze digital assets across top global cryptocurrency exchanges
Portfolio Comparator
Compare the composition, asset allocations and performance of any two portfolios in your account