Correlation Between GlaxoSmithKline PLC and Frontier Ceramics

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both GlaxoSmithKline PLC and Frontier Ceramics at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining GlaxoSmithKline PLC and Frontier Ceramics into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between GlaxoSmithKline PLC ADR and Frontier Ceramics, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on GlaxoSmithKline PLC and Frontier Ceramics and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in GlaxoSmithKline PLC with a short position of Frontier Ceramics. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of GlaxoSmithKline PLC and Frontier Ceramics.

Diversification Opportunities for GlaxoSmithKline PLC and Frontier Ceramics

-0.36
  Correlation Coefficient

Very good diversification

The 3 months correlation between GlaxoSmithKline and Frontier is -0.36. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding GlaxoSmithKline PLC ADR and Frontier Ceramics in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Frontier Ceramics and GlaxoSmithKline PLC is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on GlaxoSmithKline PLC ADR are associated (or correlated) with Frontier Ceramics. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Frontier Ceramics has no effect on the direction of GlaxoSmithKline PLC i.e., GlaxoSmithKline PLC and Frontier Ceramics go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between GlaxoSmithKline PLC and Frontier Ceramics

Considering the 90-day investment horizon GlaxoSmithKline PLC ADR is expected to under-perform the Frontier Ceramics. But the stock apears to be less risky and, when comparing its historical volatility, GlaxoSmithKline PLC ADR is 3.15 times less risky than Frontier Ceramics. The stock trades about -0.33 of its potential returns per unit of risk. The Frontier Ceramics is currently generating about 0.08 of returns per unit of risk over similar time horizon. If you would invest  1,720  in Frontier Ceramics on August 27, 2024 and sell it today you would earn a total of  80.00  from holding Frontier Ceramics or generate 4.65% return on investment over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionMoves Against 
StrengthInsignificant
Accuracy90.48%
ValuesDaily Returns

GlaxoSmithKline PLC ADR  vs.  Frontier Ceramics

 Performance 
       Timeline  
GlaxoSmithKline PLC ADR 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

0 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Very Weak
Over the last 90 days GlaxoSmithKline PLC ADR has generated negative risk-adjusted returns adding no value to investors with long positions. Despite uncertain performance in the last few months, the Stock's basic indicators remain quite persistent which may send shares a bit higher in December 2024. The latest mess may also be a sign of long-standing up-swing for the company institutional investors.
Frontier Ceramics 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

6 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Modest
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Frontier Ceramics are ranked lower than 6 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. Despite somewhat weak basic indicators, Frontier Ceramics sustained solid returns over the last few months and may actually be approaching a breakup point.

GlaxoSmithKline PLC and Frontier Ceramics Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with GlaxoSmithKline PLC and Frontier Ceramics

The main advantage of trading using opposite GlaxoSmithKline PLC and Frontier Ceramics positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if GlaxoSmithKline PLC position performs unexpectedly, Frontier Ceramics can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Frontier Ceramics will offset losses from the drop in Frontier Ceramics' long position.
The idea behind GlaxoSmithKline PLC ADR and Frontier Ceramics pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Portfolio Backtesting module to avoid under-diversification and over-optimization by backtesting your portfolios.

Other Complementary Tools

Portfolio Analyzer
Portfolio analysis module that provides access to portfolio diagnostics and optimization engine
Top Crypto Exchanges
Search and analyze digital assets across top global cryptocurrency exchanges
Stock Screener
Find equities using a custom stock filter or screen asymmetry in trading patterns, price, volume, or investment outlook.
Efficient Frontier
Plot and analyze your portfolio and positions against risk-return landscape of the market.
Watchlist Optimization
Optimize watchlists to build efficient portfolios or rebalance existing positions based on the mean-variance optimization algorithm