Correlation Between Goldman Sachs and Pro-blend(r) Maximum

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Goldman Sachs and Pro-blend(r) Maximum at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Goldman Sachs and Pro-blend(r) Maximum into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between Goldman Sachs Small and Pro Blend Maximum Term, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Goldman Sachs and Pro-blend(r) Maximum and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Goldman Sachs with a short position of Pro-blend(r) Maximum. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Goldman Sachs and Pro-blend(r) Maximum.

Diversification Opportunities for Goldman Sachs and Pro-blend(r) Maximum

0.98
  Correlation Coefficient

Almost no diversification

The 3 months correlation between Goldman and Pro-blend(r) is 0.98. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Goldman Sachs Small and Pro Blend Maximum Term in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Pro-blend(r) Maximum and Goldman Sachs is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Goldman Sachs Small are associated (or correlated) with Pro-blend(r) Maximum. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Pro-blend(r) Maximum has no effect on the direction of Goldman Sachs i.e., Goldman Sachs and Pro-blend(r) Maximum go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between Goldman Sachs and Pro-blend(r) Maximum

Assuming the 90 days horizon Goldman Sachs Small is expected to generate 1.45 times more return on investment than Pro-blend(r) Maximum. However, Goldman Sachs is 1.45 times more volatile than Pro Blend Maximum Term. It trades about 0.1 of its potential returns per unit of risk. Pro Blend Maximum Term is currently generating about 0.08 per unit of risk. If you would invest  5,508  in Goldman Sachs Small on October 22, 2024 and sell it today you would earn a total of  101.00  from holding Goldman Sachs Small or generate 1.83% return on investment over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionMoves Together 
StrengthVery Strong
Accuracy100.0%
ValuesDaily Returns

Goldman Sachs Small  vs.  Pro Blend Maximum Term

 Performance 
       Timeline  
Goldman Sachs Small 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

0 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Very Weak
Over the last 90 days Goldman Sachs Small has generated negative risk-adjusted returns adding no value to fund investors. In spite of latest weak performance, the Fund's basic indicators remain strong and the current disturbance on Wall Street may also be a sign of long term gains for the fund investors.
Pro-blend(r) Maximum 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

0 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Very Weak
Over the last 90 days Pro Blend Maximum Term has generated negative risk-adjusted returns adding no value to fund investors. In spite of fairly strong fundamental indicators, Pro-blend(r) Maximum is not utilizing all of its potentials. The current stock price disturbance, may contribute to short-term losses for the investors.

Goldman Sachs and Pro-blend(r) Maximum Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with Goldman Sachs and Pro-blend(r) Maximum

The main advantage of trading using opposite Goldman Sachs and Pro-blend(r) Maximum positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Goldman Sachs position performs unexpectedly, Pro-blend(r) Maximum can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Pro-blend(r) Maximum will offset losses from the drop in Pro-blend(r) Maximum's long position.
The idea behind Goldman Sachs Small and Pro Blend Maximum Term pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Price Exposure Probability module to analyze equity upside and downside potential for a given time horizon across multiple markets.

Other Complementary Tools

Sectors
List of equity sectors categorizing publicly traded companies based on their primary business activities
Portfolio Comparator
Compare the composition, asset allocations and performance of any two portfolios in your account
Content Syndication
Quickly integrate customizable finance content to your own investment portal
Piotroski F Score
Get Piotroski F Score based on the binary analysis strategy of nine different fundamentals
Alpha Finder
Use alpha and beta coefficients to find investment opportunities after accounting for the risk