Correlation Between Hartford Moderate and California High

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Hartford Moderate and California High at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Hartford Moderate and California High into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between Hartford Moderate Allocation and California High Yield Municipal, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Hartford Moderate and California High and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Hartford Moderate with a short position of California High. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Hartford Moderate and California High.

Diversification Opportunities for Hartford Moderate and California High

0.4
  Correlation Coefficient

Very weak diversification

The 3 months correlation between Hartford and California is 0.4. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Hartford Moderate Allocation and California High Yield Municipa in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on California High Yield and Hartford Moderate is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Hartford Moderate Allocation are associated (or correlated) with California High. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of California High Yield has no effect on the direction of Hartford Moderate i.e., Hartford Moderate and California High go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between Hartford Moderate and California High

Assuming the 90 days horizon Hartford Moderate Allocation is expected to generate 2.19 times more return on investment than California High. However, Hartford Moderate is 2.19 times more volatile than California High Yield Municipal. It trades about 0.25 of its potential returns per unit of risk. California High Yield Municipal is currently generating about 0.41 per unit of risk. If you would invest  1,332  in Hartford Moderate Allocation on September 13, 2024 and sell it today you would earn a total of  22.00  from holding Hartford Moderate Allocation or generate 1.65% return on investment over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionMoves Together 
StrengthWeak
Accuracy100.0%
ValuesDaily Returns

Hartford Moderate Allocation  vs.  California High Yield Municipa

 Performance 
       Timeline  
Hartford Moderate 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

10 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
OK
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Hartford Moderate Allocation are ranked lower than 10 (%) of all funds and portfolios of funds over the last 90 days. In spite of fairly strong forward indicators, Hartford Moderate is not utilizing all of its potentials. The current stock price disturbance, may contribute to short-term losses for the investors.
California High Yield 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

1 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Weak
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in California High Yield Municipal are ranked lower than 1 (%) of all funds and portfolios of funds over the last 90 days. In spite of fairly strong forward indicators, California High is not utilizing all of its potentials. The current stock price disturbance, may contribute to short-term losses for the investors.

Hartford Moderate and California High Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with Hartford Moderate and California High

The main advantage of trading using opposite Hartford Moderate and California High positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Hartford Moderate position performs unexpectedly, California High can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in California High will offset losses from the drop in California High's long position.
The idea behind Hartford Moderate Allocation and California High Yield Municipal pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Global Markets Map module to get a quick overview of global market snapshot using zoomable world map. Drill down to check world indexes.

Other Complementary Tools

Instant Ratings
Determine any equity ratings based on digital recommendations. Macroaxis instant equity ratings are based on combination of fundamental analysis and risk-adjusted market performance
FinTech Suite
Use AI to screen and filter profitable investment opportunities
Portfolio Backtesting
Avoid under-diversification and over-optimization by backtesting your portfolios
Fundamental Analysis
View fundamental data based on most recent published financial statements
Companies Directory
Evaluate performance of over 100,000 Stocks, Funds, and ETFs against different fundamentals