Correlation Between Service Properties and Gaming

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Service Properties and Gaming at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Service Properties and Gaming into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between Service Properties Trust and Gaming and Leisure, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Service Properties and Gaming and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Service Properties with a short position of Gaming. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Service Properties and Gaming.

Diversification Opportunities for Service Properties and Gaming

-0.09
  Correlation Coefficient

Good diversification

The 3 months correlation between Service and Gaming is -0.09. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Service Properties Trust and Gaming and Leisure in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Gaming and Leisure and Service Properties is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Service Properties Trust are associated (or correlated) with Gaming. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Gaming and Leisure has no effect on the direction of Service Properties i.e., Service Properties and Gaming go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between Service Properties and Gaming

Assuming the 90 days horizon Service Properties Trust is expected to under-perform the Gaming. In addition to that, Service Properties is 2.52 times more volatile than Gaming and Leisure. It trades about -0.05 of its total potential returns per unit of risk. Gaming and Leisure is currently generating about 0.02 per unit of volatility. If you would invest  4,352  in Gaming and Leisure on October 25, 2024 and sell it today you would earn a total of  350.00  from holding Gaming and Leisure or generate 8.04% return on investment over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionMoves Against 
StrengthInsignificant
Accuracy100.0%
ValuesDaily Returns

Service Properties Trust  vs.  Gaming and Leisure

 Performance 
       Timeline  
Service Properties Trust 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

0 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Very Weak
Over the last 90 days Service Properties Trust has generated negative risk-adjusted returns adding no value to investors with long positions. Despite weak performance in the last few months, the Stock's basic indicators remain nearly stable which may send shares a bit higher in February 2025. The current disturbance may also be a sign of long-run up-swing for the company stockholders.
Gaming and Leisure 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

2 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Weak
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Gaming and Leisure are ranked lower than 2 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. Despite nearly stable basic indicators, Gaming is not utilizing all of its potentials. The current stock price disturbance, may contribute to mid-run losses for the stockholders.

Service Properties and Gaming Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with Service Properties and Gaming

The main advantage of trading using opposite Service Properties and Gaming positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Service Properties position performs unexpectedly, Gaming can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Gaming will offset losses from the drop in Gaming's long position.
The idea behind Service Properties Trust and Gaming and Leisure pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Portfolio Dashboard module to portfolio dashboard that provides centralized access to all your investments.

Other Complementary Tools

Financial Widgets
Easily integrated Macroaxis content with over 30 different plug-and-play financial widgets
Insider Screener
Find insiders across different sectors to evaluate their impact on performance
Portfolio Optimization
Compute new portfolio that will generate highest expected return given your specified tolerance for risk
Watchlist Optimization
Optimize watchlists to build efficient portfolios or rebalance existing positions based on the mean-variance optimization algorithm
Premium Stories
Follow Macroaxis premium stories from verified contributors across different equity types, categories and coverage scope