Correlation Between Hyster-Yale Materials and Grand Canyon

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Hyster-Yale Materials and Grand Canyon at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Hyster-Yale Materials and Grand Canyon into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between Hyster Yale Materials Handling and Grand Canyon Education, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Hyster-Yale Materials and Grand Canyon and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Hyster-Yale Materials with a short position of Grand Canyon. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Hyster-Yale Materials and Grand Canyon.

Diversification Opportunities for Hyster-Yale Materials and Grand Canyon

-0.69
  Correlation Coefficient

Excellent diversification

The 3 months correlation between Hyster-Yale and Grand is -0.69. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Hyster Yale Materials Handling and Grand Canyon Education in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Grand Canyon Education and Hyster-Yale Materials is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Hyster Yale Materials Handling are associated (or correlated) with Grand Canyon. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Grand Canyon Education has no effect on the direction of Hyster-Yale Materials i.e., Hyster-Yale Materials and Grand Canyon go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between Hyster-Yale Materials and Grand Canyon

Assuming the 90 days trading horizon Hyster Yale Materials Handling is expected to generate 1.7 times more return on investment than Grand Canyon. However, Hyster-Yale Materials is 1.7 times more volatile than Grand Canyon Education. It trades about 0.04 of its potential returns per unit of risk. Grand Canyon Education is currently generating about 0.06 per unit of risk. If you would invest  4,208  in Hyster Yale Materials Handling on August 26, 2024 and sell it today you would earn a total of  992.00  from holding Hyster Yale Materials Handling or generate 23.57% return on investment over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionMoves Against 
StrengthWeak
Accuracy100.0%
ValuesDaily Returns

Hyster Yale Materials Handling  vs.  Grand Canyon Education

 Performance 
       Timeline  
Hyster Yale Materials 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

0 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Very Weak
Over the last 90 days Hyster Yale Materials Handling has generated negative risk-adjusted returns adding no value to investors with long positions. Despite nearly stable technical and fundamental indicators, Hyster-Yale Materials is not utilizing all of its potentials. The current stock price disturbance, may contribute to mid-run losses for the stockholders.
Grand Canyon Education 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

11 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Good
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Grand Canyon Education are ranked lower than 11 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. In spite of comparatively uncertain basic indicators, Grand Canyon unveiled solid returns over the last few months and may actually be approaching a breakup point.

Hyster-Yale Materials and Grand Canyon Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with Hyster-Yale Materials and Grand Canyon

The main advantage of trading using opposite Hyster-Yale Materials and Grand Canyon positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Hyster-Yale Materials position performs unexpectedly, Grand Canyon can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Grand Canyon will offset losses from the drop in Grand Canyon's long position.
The idea behind Hyster Yale Materials Handling and Grand Canyon Education pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the USA ETFs module to find actively traded Exchange Traded Funds (ETF) in USA.

Other Complementary Tools

Portfolio Suggestion
Get suggestions outside of your existing asset allocation including your own model portfolios
Efficient Frontier
Plot and analyze your portfolio and positions against risk-return landscape of the market.
Insider Screener
Find insiders across different sectors to evaluate their impact on performance
Cryptocurrency Center
Build and monitor diversified portfolio of extremely risky digital assets and cryptocurrency
Bond Analysis
Evaluate and analyze corporate bonds as a potential investment for your portfolios.