Correlation Between InterContinental and Gaming

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both InterContinental and Gaming at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining InterContinental and Gaming into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between InterContinental Hotels Group and Gaming and Leisure, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on InterContinental and Gaming and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in InterContinental with a short position of Gaming. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of InterContinental and Gaming.

Diversification Opportunities for InterContinental and Gaming

0.24
  Correlation Coefficient

Modest diversification

The 3 months correlation between InterContinental and Gaming is 0.24. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding InterContinental Hotels Group and Gaming and Leisure in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Gaming and Leisure and InterContinental is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on InterContinental Hotels Group are associated (or correlated) with Gaming. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Gaming and Leisure has no effect on the direction of InterContinental i.e., InterContinental and Gaming go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between InterContinental and Gaming

Assuming the 90 days trading horizon InterContinental Hotels Group is expected to generate 0.62 times more return on investment than Gaming. However, InterContinental Hotels Group is 1.61 times less risky than Gaming. It trades about 0.37 of its potential returns per unit of risk. Gaming and Leisure is currently generating about -0.01 per unit of risk. If you would invest  11,800  in InterContinental Hotels Group on November 6, 2024 and sell it today you would earn a total of  1,100  from holding InterContinental Hotels Group or generate 9.32% return on investment over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionMoves Together 
StrengthVery Weak
Accuracy95.24%
ValuesDaily Returns

InterContinental Hotels Group  vs.  Gaming and Leisure

 Performance 
       Timeline  
InterContinental Hotels 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

18 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Solid
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in InterContinental Hotels Group are ranked lower than 18 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. Despite nearly unsteady basic indicators, InterContinental reported solid returns over the last few months and may actually be approaching a breakup point.
Gaming and Leisure 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

0 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Very Weak
Over the last 90 days Gaming and Leisure has generated negative risk-adjusted returns adding no value to investors with long positions. Despite nearly stable basic indicators, Gaming is not utilizing all of its potentials. The current stock price disturbance, may contribute to mid-run losses for the stockholders.

InterContinental and Gaming Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with InterContinental and Gaming

The main advantage of trading using opposite InterContinental and Gaming positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if InterContinental position performs unexpectedly, Gaming can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Gaming will offset losses from the drop in Gaming's long position.
The idea behind InterContinental Hotels Group and Gaming and Leisure pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Idea Breakdown module to analyze constituents of all Macroaxis ideas. Macroaxis investment ideas are predefined, sector-focused investing themes.

Other Complementary Tools

Stocks Directory
Find actively traded stocks across global markets
Portfolio Diagnostics
Use generated alerts and portfolio events aggregator to diagnose current holdings
Technical Analysis
Check basic technical indicators and analysis based on most latest market data
Stock Screener
Find equities using a custom stock filter or screen asymmetry in trading patterns, price, volume, or investment outlook.
Price Exposure Probability
Analyze equity upside and downside potential for a given time horizon across multiple markets