Correlation Between IShares Cohen and Pacer Benchmark

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both IShares Cohen and Pacer Benchmark at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining IShares Cohen and Pacer Benchmark into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between iShares Cohen Steers and Pacer Benchmark Industrial, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on IShares Cohen and Pacer Benchmark and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in IShares Cohen with a short position of Pacer Benchmark. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of IShares Cohen and Pacer Benchmark.

Diversification Opportunities for IShares Cohen and Pacer Benchmark

0.57
  Correlation Coefficient

Very weak diversification

The 3 months correlation between IShares and Pacer is 0.57. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding iShares Cohen Steers and Pacer Benchmark Industrial in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Pacer Benchmark Indu and IShares Cohen is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on iShares Cohen Steers are associated (or correlated) with Pacer Benchmark. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Pacer Benchmark Indu has no effect on the direction of IShares Cohen i.e., IShares Cohen and Pacer Benchmark go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between IShares Cohen and Pacer Benchmark

Considering the 90-day investment horizon iShares Cohen Steers is expected to generate 0.98 times more return on investment than Pacer Benchmark. However, iShares Cohen Steers is 1.02 times less risky than Pacer Benchmark. It trades about 0.12 of its potential returns per unit of risk. Pacer Benchmark Industrial is currently generating about 0.01 per unit of risk. If you would invest  6,470  in iShares Cohen Steers on August 30, 2024 and sell it today you would earn a total of  179.00  from holding iShares Cohen Steers or generate 2.77% return on investment over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionMoves Together 
StrengthWeak
Accuracy100.0%
ValuesDaily Returns

iShares Cohen Steers  vs.  Pacer Benchmark Industrial

 Performance 
       Timeline  
iShares Cohen Steers 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

5 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
OK
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in iShares Cohen Steers are ranked lower than 5 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. Despite nearly stable fundamental indicators, IShares Cohen is not utilizing all of its potentials. The latest stock price disturbance, may contribute to mid-run losses for the stockholders.
Pacer Benchmark Indu 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

0 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Very Weak
Over the last 90 days Pacer Benchmark Industrial has generated negative risk-adjusted returns adding no value to investors with long positions. In spite of comparatively stable fundamental indicators, Pacer Benchmark is not utilizing all of its potentials. The latest stock price uproar, may contribute to short-horizon losses for the private investors.

IShares Cohen and Pacer Benchmark Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with IShares Cohen and Pacer Benchmark

The main advantage of trading using opposite IShares Cohen and Pacer Benchmark positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if IShares Cohen position performs unexpectedly, Pacer Benchmark can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Pacer Benchmark will offset losses from the drop in Pacer Benchmark's long position.
The idea behind iShares Cohen Steers and Pacer Benchmark Industrial pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Efficient Frontier module to plot and analyze your portfolio and positions against risk-return landscape of the market..

Other Complementary Tools

Watchlist Optimization
Optimize watchlists to build efficient portfolios or rebalance existing positions based on the mean-variance optimization algorithm
Equity Valuation
Check real value of public entities based on technical and fundamental data
Efficient Frontier
Plot and analyze your portfolio and positions against risk-return landscape of the market.
Bond Analysis
Evaluate and analyze corporate bonds as a potential investment for your portfolios.
USA ETFs
Find actively traded Exchange Traded Funds (ETF) in USA