Correlation Between Guinness Atkinson and Matthews Pacific

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Guinness Atkinson and Matthews Pacific at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Guinness Atkinson and Matthews Pacific into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between Guinness Atkinson China and Matthews Pacific Tiger, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Guinness Atkinson and Matthews Pacific and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Guinness Atkinson with a short position of Matthews Pacific. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Guinness Atkinson and Matthews Pacific.

Diversification Opportunities for Guinness Atkinson and Matthews Pacific

0.89
  Correlation Coefficient

Very poor diversification

The 3 months correlation between Guinness and Matthews is 0.89. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Guinness Atkinson China and Matthews Pacific Tiger in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Matthews Pacific Tiger and Guinness Atkinson is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Guinness Atkinson China are associated (or correlated) with Matthews Pacific. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Matthews Pacific Tiger has no effect on the direction of Guinness Atkinson i.e., Guinness Atkinson and Matthews Pacific go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between Guinness Atkinson and Matthews Pacific

Assuming the 90 days horizon Guinness Atkinson China is expected to under-perform the Matthews Pacific. In addition to that, Guinness Atkinson is 1.56 times more volatile than Matthews Pacific Tiger. It trades about -0.09 of its total potential returns per unit of risk. Matthews Pacific Tiger is currently generating about -0.09 per unit of volatility. If you would invest  1,991  in Matthews Pacific Tiger on September 1, 2024 and sell it today you would lose (40.00) from holding Matthews Pacific Tiger or give up 2.01% of portfolio value over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionMoves Together 
StrengthStrong
Accuracy100.0%
ValuesDaily Returns

Guinness Atkinson China  vs.  Matthews Pacific Tiger

 Performance 
       Timeline  
Guinness Atkinson China 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

8 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
OK
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Guinness Atkinson China are ranked lower than 8 (%) of all funds and portfolios of funds over the last 90 days. In spite of fairly weak forward-looking signals, Guinness Atkinson showed solid returns over the last few months and may actually be approaching a breakup point.
Matthews Pacific Tiger 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

3 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Insignificant
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Matthews Pacific Tiger are ranked lower than 3 (%) of all funds and portfolios of funds over the last 90 days. In spite of fairly strong basic indicators, Matthews Pacific is not utilizing all of its potentials. The current stock price disturbance, may contribute to short-term losses for the investors.

Guinness Atkinson and Matthews Pacific Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with Guinness Atkinson and Matthews Pacific

The main advantage of trading using opposite Guinness Atkinson and Matthews Pacific positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Guinness Atkinson position performs unexpectedly, Matthews Pacific can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Matthews Pacific will offset losses from the drop in Matthews Pacific's long position.
The idea behind Guinness Atkinson China and Matthews Pacific Tiger pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Commodity Channel module to use Commodity Channel Index to analyze current equity momentum.

Other Complementary Tools

Volatility Analysis
Get historical volatility and risk analysis based on latest market data
Balance Of Power
Check stock momentum by analyzing Balance Of Power indicator and other technical ratios
Portfolio Rebalancing
Analyze risk-adjusted returns against different time horizons to find asset-allocation targets
Crypto Correlations
Use cryptocurrency correlation module to diversify your cryptocurrency portfolio across multiple coins
Equity Forecasting
Use basic forecasting models to generate price predictions and determine price momentum