Correlation Between IA Clarington and Mackenzie Growth

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both IA Clarington and Mackenzie Growth at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining IA Clarington and Mackenzie Growth into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between IA Clarington Loomis and Mackenzie Growth Allocation, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on IA Clarington and Mackenzie Growth and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in IA Clarington with a short position of Mackenzie Growth. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of IA Clarington and Mackenzie Growth.

Diversification Opportunities for IA Clarington and Mackenzie Growth

0.95
  Correlation Coefficient

Almost no diversification

The 3 months correlation between IGAF and Mackenzie is 0.95. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding IA Clarington Loomis and Mackenzie Growth Allocation in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Mackenzie Growth All and IA Clarington is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on IA Clarington Loomis are associated (or correlated) with Mackenzie Growth. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Mackenzie Growth All has no effect on the direction of IA Clarington i.e., IA Clarington and Mackenzie Growth go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between IA Clarington and Mackenzie Growth

Assuming the 90 days trading horizon IA Clarington is expected to generate 1.21 times less return on investment than Mackenzie Growth. In addition to that, IA Clarington is 1.15 times more volatile than Mackenzie Growth Allocation. It trades about 0.14 of its total potential returns per unit of risk. Mackenzie Growth Allocation is currently generating about 0.2 per unit of volatility. If you would invest  2,842  in Mackenzie Growth Allocation on August 29, 2024 and sell it today you would earn a total of  73.00  from holding Mackenzie Growth Allocation or generate 2.57% return on investment over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionMoves Together 
StrengthVery Strong
Accuracy100.0%
ValuesDaily Returns

IA Clarington Loomis  vs.  Mackenzie Growth Allocation

 Performance 
       Timeline  
IA Clarington Loomis 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

10 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Good
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in IA Clarington Loomis are ranked lower than 10 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. In spite of very healthy basic indicators, IA Clarington is not utilizing all of its potentials. The recent stock price disarray, may contribute to short-term losses for the investors.
Mackenzie Growth All 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

19 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Solid
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Mackenzie Growth Allocation are ranked lower than 19 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. In spite of very unfluctuating basic indicators, Mackenzie Growth may actually be approaching a critical reversion point that can send shares even higher in December 2024.

IA Clarington and Mackenzie Growth Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with IA Clarington and Mackenzie Growth

The main advantage of trading using opposite IA Clarington and Mackenzie Growth positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if IA Clarington position performs unexpectedly, Mackenzie Growth can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Mackenzie Growth will offset losses from the drop in Mackenzie Growth's long position.
The idea behind IA Clarington Loomis and Mackenzie Growth Allocation pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Pair Correlation module to compare performance and examine fundamental relationship between any two equity instruments.

Other Complementary Tools

ETFs
Find actively traded Exchange Traded Funds (ETF) from around the world
Portfolio Holdings
Check your current holdings and cash postion to detemine if your portfolio needs rebalancing
Alpha Finder
Use alpha and beta coefficients to find investment opportunities after accounting for the risk
CEOs Directory
Screen CEOs from public companies around the world
Idea Optimizer
Use advanced portfolio builder with pre-computed micro ideas to build optimal portfolio