Correlation Between Johnson Johnson and Goldman Sachs

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Johnson Johnson and Goldman Sachs at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Johnson Johnson and Goldman Sachs into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between Johnson Johnson and Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Johnson Johnson and Goldman Sachs and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Johnson Johnson with a short position of Goldman Sachs. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Johnson Johnson and Goldman Sachs.

Diversification Opportunities for Johnson Johnson and Goldman Sachs

-0.78
  Correlation Coefficient

Pay attention - limited upside

The 3 months correlation between Johnson and Goldman is -0.78. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Johnson Johnson and Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta and Johnson Johnson is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Johnson Johnson are associated (or correlated) with Goldman Sachs. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta has no effect on the direction of Johnson Johnson i.e., Johnson Johnson and Goldman Sachs go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between Johnson Johnson and Goldman Sachs

Considering the 90-day investment horizon Johnson Johnson is expected to under-perform the Goldman Sachs. But the stock apears to be less risky and, when comparing its historical volatility, Johnson Johnson is 1.7 times less risky than Goldman Sachs. The stock trades about -0.07 of its potential returns per unit of risk. The Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta is currently generating about 0.12 of returns per unit of risk over similar time horizon. If you would invest  6,854  in Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta on August 29, 2024 and sell it today you would earn a total of  717.00  from holding Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta or generate 10.46% return on investment over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionMoves Against 
StrengthWeak
Accuracy100.0%
ValuesDaily Returns

Johnson Johnson  vs.  Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta

 Performance 
       Timeline  
Johnson Johnson 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

0 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Very Weak
Over the last 90 days Johnson Johnson has generated negative risk-adjusted returns adding no value to investors with long positions. Even with relatively steady basic indicators, Johnson Johnson is not utilizing all of its potentials. The latest stock price chaos, may contribute to medium-term losses for the stakeholders.
Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

9 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
OK
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta are ranked lower than 9 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. In spite of rather unfluctuating basic indicators, Goldman Sachs may actually be approaching a critical reversion point that can send shares even higher in December 2024.

Johnson Johnson and Goldman Sachs Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with Johnson Johnson and Goldman Sachs

The main advantage of trading using opposite Johnson Johnson and Goldman Sachs positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Johnson Johnson position performs unexpectedly, Goldman Sachs can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Goldman Sachs will offset losses from the drop in Goldman Sachs' long position.
The idea behind Johnson Johnson and Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Portfolio Optimization module to compute new portfolio that will generate highest expected return given your specified tolerance for risk.

Other Complementary Tools

ETF Categories
List of ETF categories grouped based on various criteria, such as the investment strategy or type of investments
Share Portfolio
Track or share privately all of your investments from the convenience of any device
Theme Ratings
Determine theme ratings based on digital equity recommendations. Macroaxis theme ratings are based on combination of fundamental analysis and risk-adjusted market performance
Companies Directory
Evaluate performance of over 100,000 Stocks, Funds, and ETFs against different fundamentals
Earnings Calls
Check upcoming earnings announcements updated hourly across public exchanges