Correlation Between Johcm Emerging and Oakmark International

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Johcm Emerging and Oakmark International at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Johcm Emerging and Oakmark International into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between Johcm Emerging Markets and Oakmark International, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Johcm Emerging and Oakmark International and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Johcm Emerging with a short position of Oakmark International. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Johcm Emerging and Oakmark International.

Diversification Opportunities for Johcm Emerging and Oakmark International

0.61
  Correlation Coefficient

Poor diversification

The 3 months correlation between Johcm and Oakmark is 0.61. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Johcm Emerging Markets and Oakmark International in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Oakmark International and Johcm Emerging is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Johcm Emerging Markets are associated (or correlated) with Oakmark International. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Oakmark International has no effect on the direction of Johcm Emerging i.e., Johcm Emerging and Oakmark International go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between Johcm Emerging and Oakmark International

Assuming the 90 days horizon Johcm Emerging Markets is expected to under-perform the Oakmark International. But the mutual fund apears to be less risky and, when comparing its historical volatility, Johcm Emerging Markets is 1.31 times less risky than Oakmark International. The mutual fund trades about -0.18 of its potential returns per unit of risk. The Oakmark International is currently generating about -0.1 of returns per unit of risk over similar time horizon. If you would invest  2,655  in Oakmark International on September 5, 2024 and sell it today you would lose (68.00) from holding Oakmark International or give up 2.56% of portfolio value over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionMoves Together 
StrengthSignificant
Accuracy95.45%
ValuesDaily Returns

Johcm Emerging Markets  vs.  Oakmark International

 Performance 
       Timeline  
Johcm Emerging Markets 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

3 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Insignificant
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Johcm Emerging Markets are ranked lower than 3 (%) of all funds and portfolios of funds over the last 90 days. In spite of fairly strong primary indicators, Johcm Emerging is not utilizing all of its potentials. The current stock price disturbance, may contribute to short-term losses for the investors.
Oakmark International 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

0 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Very Weak
Over the last 90 days Oakmark International has generated negative risk-adjusted returns adding no value to fund investors. In spite of fairly strong forward indicators, Oakmark International is not utilizing all of its potentials. The current stock price disturbance, may contribute to short-term losses for the investors.

Johcm Emerging and Oakmark International Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with Johcm Emerging and Oakmark International

The main advantage of trading using opposite Johcm Emerging and Oakmark International positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Johcm Emerging position performs unexpectedly, Oakmark International can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Oakmark International will offset losses from the drop in Oakmark International's long position.
The idea behind Johcm Emerging Markets and Oakmark International pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Portfolio Manager module to state of the art Portfolio Manager to monitor and improve performance of your invested capital.

Other Complementary Tools

Portfolio Comparator
Compare the composition, asset allocations and performance of any two portfolios in your account
AI Portfolio Architect
Use AI to generate optimal portfolios and find profitable investment opportunities
Portfolio Center
All portfolio management and optimization tools to improve performance of your portfolios
Positions Ratings
Determine portfolio positions ratings based on digital equity recommendations. Macroaxis instant position ratings are based on combination of fundamental analysis and risk-adjusted market performance
Portfolio Rebalancing
Analyze risk-adjusted returns against different time horizons to find asset-allocation targets