Correlation Between Kellanova and Bridgetown Holdings

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Kellanova and Bridgetown Holdings at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Kellanova and Bridgetown Holdings into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between Kellanova and Bridgetown Holdings, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Kellanova and Bridgetown Holdings and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Kellanova with a short position of Bridgetown Holdings. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Kellanova and Bridgetown Holdings.

Diversification Opportunities for Kellanova and Bridgetown Holdings

0.17
  Correlation Coefficient

Average diversification

The 3 months correlation between Kellanova and Bridgetown is 0.17. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Kellanova and Bridgetown Holdings in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Bridgetown Holdings and Kellanova is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Kellanova are associated (or correlated) with Bridgetown Holdings. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Bridgetown Holdings has no effect on the direction of Kellanova i.e., Kellanova and Bridgetown Holdings go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between Kellanova and Bridgetown Holdings

Taking into account the 90-day investment horizon Kellanova is expected to generate 8.09 times less return on investment than Bridgetown Holdings. But when comparing it to its historical volatility, Kellanova is 9.59 times less risky than Bridgetown Holdings. It trades about 0.05 of its potential returns per unit of risk. Bridgetown Holdings is currently generating about 0.05 of returns per unit of risk over similar time horizon. If you would invest  21.00  in Bridgetown Holdings on October 11, 2024 and sell it today you would earn a total of  0.00  from holding Bridgetown Holdings or generate 0.0% return on investment over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionMoves Together 
StrengthInsignificant
Accuracy25.6%
ValuesDaily Returns

Kellanova  vs.  Bridgetown Holdings

 Performance 
       Timeline  
Kellanova 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

12 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Good
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Kellanova are ranked lower than 12 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. Despite quite persistent forward-looking signals, Kellanova is not utilizing all of its potentials. The current stock price mess, may contribute to short-term losses for the institutional investors.
Bridgetown Holdings 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

0 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Very Weak
Over the last 90 days Bridgetown Holdings has generated negative risk-adjusted returns adding no value to investors with long positions. In spite of fairly stable basic indicators, Bridgetown Holdings is not utilizing all of its potentials. The current stock price fuss, may contribute to near-short-term losses for the sophisticated investors.

Kellanova and Bridgetown Holdings Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with Kellanova and Bridgetown Holdings

The main advantage of trading using opposite Kellanova and Bridgetown Holdings positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Kellanova position performs unexpectedly, Bridgetown Holdings can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Bridgetown Holdings will offset losses from the drop in Bridgetown Holdings' long position.
The idea behind Kellanova and Bridgetown Holdings pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Equity Analysis module to research over 250,000 global equities including funds, stocks and ETFs to find investment opportunities.

Other Complementary Tools

Sign In To Macroaxis
Sign in to explore Macroaxis' wealth optimization platform and fintech modules
Portfolio Center
All portfolio management and optimization tools to improve performance of your portfolios
Portfolio Analyzer
Portfolio analysis module that provides access to portfolio diagnostics and optimization engine
Portfolio Suggestion
Get suggestions outside of your existing asset allocation including your own model portfolios
Theme Ratings
Determine theme ratings based on digital equity recommendations. Macroaxis theme ratings are based on combination of fundamental analysis and risk-adjusted market performance