Correlation Between MT 1997 and Coloseum Holding

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both MT 1997 and Coloseum Holding at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining MT 1997 and Coloseum Holding into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between MT 1997 AS and Coloseum Holding as, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on MT 1997 and Coloseum Holding and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in MT 1997 with a short position of Coloseum Holding. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of MT 1997 and Coloseum Holding.

Diversification Opportunities for MT 1997 and Coloseum Holding

0.67
  Correlation Coefficient

Poor diversification

The 3 months correlation between KLIKY and Coloseum is 0.67. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding MT 1997 AS and Coloseum Holding as in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Coloseum Holding and MT 1997 is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on MT 1997 AS are associated (or correlated) with Coloseum Holding. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Coloseum Holding has no effect on the direction of MT 1997 i.e., MT 1997 and Coloseum Holding go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between MT 1997 and Coloseum Holding

Assuming the 90 days trading horizon MT 1997 AS is expected to generate 0.16 times more return on investment than Coloseum Holding. However, MT 1997 AS is 6.37 times less risky than Coloseum Holding. It trades about -0.24 of its potential returns per unit of risk. Coloseum Holding as is currently generating about -0.2 per unit of risk. If you would invest  2,800,000  in MT 1997 AS on August 29, 2024 and sell it today you would lose (100,000) from holding MT 1997 AS or give up 3.57% of portfolio value over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionMoves Together 
StrengthSignificant
Accuracy100.0%
ValuesDaily Returns

MT 1997 AS  vs.  Coloseum Holding as

 Performance 
       Timeline  
MT 1997 AS 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

0 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Very Weak
Over the last 90 days MT 1997 AS has generated negative risk-adjusted returns adding no value to investors with long positions. Even with weak performance in the last few months, the Stock's basic indicators remain relatively invariable which may send shares a bit higher in December 2024. The latest agitation may also be a sign of long-running up-swing for the enterprise retail investors.
Coloseum Holding 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

0 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Very Weak
Over the last 90 days Coloseum Holding as has generated negative risk-adjusted returns adding no value to investors with long positions. Even with weak performance in the last few months, the Stock's basic indicators remain relatively invariable which may send shares a bit higher in December 2024. The latest agitation may also be a sign of long-running up-swing for the enterprise retail investors.

MT 1997 and Coloseum Holding Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with MT 1997 and Coloseum Holding

The main advantage of trading using opposite MT 1997 and Coloseum Holding positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if MT 1997 position performs unexpectedly, Coloseum Holding can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Coloseum Holding will offset losses from the drop in Coloseum Holding's long position.
The idea behind MT 1997 AS and Coloseum Holding as pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the CEOs Directory module to screen CEOs from public companies around the world.

Other Complementary Tools

Equity Analysis
Research over 250,000 global equities including funds, stocks and ETFs to find investment opportunities
Portfolio Center
All portfolio management and optimization tools to improve performance of your portfolios
Sign In To Macroaxis
Sign in to explore Macroaxis' wealth optimization platform and fintech modules
Idea Analyzer
Analyze all characteristics, volatility and risk-adjusted return of Macroaxis ideas
Money Managers
Screen money managers from public funds and ETFs managed around the world