Correlation Between Kimberly Clark and Reckitt Benckiser

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Kimberly Clark and Reckitt Benckiser at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Kimberly Clark and Reckitt Benckiser into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between Kimberly Clark and Reckitt Benckiser Group, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Kimberly Clark and Reckitt Benckiser and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Kimberly Clark with a short position of Reckitt Benckiser. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Kimberly Clark and Reckitt Benckiser.

Diversification Opportunities for Kimberly Clark and Reckitt Benckiser

-0.5
  Correlation Coefficient

Very good diversification

The 3 months correlation between Kimberly and Reckitt is -0.5. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Kimberly Clark and Reckitt Benckiser Group in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Reckitt Benckiser and Kimberly Clark is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Kimberly Clark are associated (or correlated) with Reckitt Benckiser. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Reckitt Benckiser has no effect on the direction of Kimberly Clark i.e., Kimberly Clark and Reckitt Benckiser go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between Kimberly Clark and Reckitt Benckiser

Considering the 90-day investment horizon Kimberly Clark is expected to generate 0.49 times more return on investment than Reckitt Benckiser. However, Kimberly Clark is 2.06 times less risky than Reckitt Benckiser. It trades about 0.01 of its potential returns per unit of risk. Reckitt Benckiser Group is currently generating about -0.14 per unit of risk. If you would invest  13,689  in Kimberly Clark on August 24, 2024 and sell it today you would earn a total of  14.00  from holding Kimberly Clark or generate 0.1% return on investment over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionMoves Against 
StrengthVery Weak
Accuracy100.0%
ValuesDaily Returns

Kimberly Clark  vs.  Reckitt Benckiser Group

 Performance 
       Timeline  
Kimberly Clark 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

0 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Very Weak
Over the last 90 days Kimberly Clark has generated negative risk-adjusted returns adding no value to investors with long positions. Despite somewhat strong primary indicators, Kimberly Clark is not utilizing all of its potentials. The latest stock price disturbance, may contribute to short-term losses for the investors.
Reckitt Benckiser 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

5 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Modest
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Reckitt Benckiser Group are ranked lower than 5 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. In spite of fairly fragile essential indicators, Reckitt Benckiser may actually be approaching a critical reversion point that can send shares even higher in December 2024.

Kimberly Clark and Reckitt Benckiser Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with Kimberly Clark and Reckitt Benckiser

The main advantage of trading using opposite Kimberly Clark and Reckitt Benckiser positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Kimberly Clark position performs unexpectedly, Reckitt Benckiser can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Reckitt Benckiser will offset losses from the drop in Reckitt Benckiser's long position.
The idea behind Kimberly Clark and Reckitt Benckiser Group pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Aroon Oscillator module to analyze current equity momentum using Aroon Oscillator and other momentum ratios.

Other Complementary Tools

Balance Of Power
Check stock momentum by analyzing Balance Of Power indicator and other technical ratios
Portfolio Suggestion
Get suggestions outside of your existing asset allocation including your own model portfolios
Financial Widgets
Easily integrated Macroaxis content with over 30 different plug-and-play financial widgets
Alpha Finder
Use alpha and beta coefficients to find investment opportunities after accounting for the risk
Portfolio Volatility
Check portfolio volatility and analyze historical return density to properly model market risk