Correlation Between FT Cboe and Goldman Sachs

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both FT Cboe and Goldman Sachs at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining FT Cboe and Goldman Sachs into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between FT Cboe Vest and Goldman Sachs Nasdaq 100, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on FT Cboe and Goldman Sachs and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in FT Cboe with a short position of Goldman Sachs. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of FT Cboe and Goldman Sachs.

Diversification Opportunities for FT Cboe and Goldman Sachs

-0.27
  Correlation Coefficient

Very good diversification

The 3 months correlation between KNG and Goldman is -0.27. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding FT Cboe Vest and Goldman Sachs Nasdaq 100 in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Goldman Sachs Nasdaq and FT Cboe is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on FT Cboe Vest are associated (or correlated) with Goldman Sachs. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Goldman Sachs Nasdaq has no effect on the direction of FT Cboe i.e., FT Cboe and Goldman Sachs go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between FT Cboe and Goldman Sachs

Considering the 90-day investment horizon FT Cboe Vest is expected to generate 0.72 times more return on investment than Goldman Sachs. However, FT Cboe Vest is 1.39 times less risky than Goldman Sachs. It trades about 0.23 of its potential returns per unit of risk. Goldman Sachs Nasdaq 100 is currently generating about 0.13 per unit of risk. If you would invest  4,957  in FT Cboe Vest on November 3, 2024 and sell it today you would earn a total of  194.00  from holding FT Cboe Vest or generate 3.91% return on investment over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionMoves Against 
StrengthInsignificant
Accuracy95.24%
ValuesDaily Returns

FT Cboe Vest  vs.  Goldman Sachs Nasdaq 100

 Performance 
       Timeline  
FT Cboe Vest 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

0 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Very Weak
Over the last 90 days FT Cboe Vest has generated negative risk-adjusted returns adding no value to investors with long positions. Despite nearly stable basic indicators, FT Cboe is not utilizing all of its potentials. The current stock price disturbance, may contribute to mid-run losses for the stockholders.
Goldman Sachs Nasdaq 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

10 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
OK
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Goldman Sachs Nasdaq 100 are ranked lower than 10 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. Even with relatively weak forward indicators, Goldman Sachs may actually be approaching a critical reversion point that can send shares even higher in March 2025.

FT Cboe and Goldman Sachs Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with FT Cboe and Goldman Sachs

The main advantage of trading using opposite FT Cboe and Goldman Sachs positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if FT Cboe position performs unexpectedly, Goldman Sachs can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Goldman Sachs will offset losses from the drop in Goldman Sachs' long position.
The idea behind FT Cboe Vest and Goldman Sachs Nasdaq 100 pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Equity Forecasting module to use basic forecasting models to generate price predictions and determine price momentum.

Other Complementary Tools

Portfolio Rebalancing
Analyze risk-adjusted returns against different time horizons to find asset-allocation targets
Headlines Timeline
Stay connected to all market stories and filter out noise. Drill down to analyze hype elasticity
Premium Stories
Follow Macroaxis premium stories from verified contributors across different equity types, categories and coverage scope
My Watchlist Analysis
Analyze my current watchlist and to refresh optimization strategy. Macroaxis watchlist is based on self-learning algorithm to remember stocks you like
Theme Ratings
Determine theme ratings based on digital equity recommendations. Macroaxis theme ratings are based on combination of fundamental analysis and risk-adjusted market performance