Correlation Between Loomis Sayles and Columbia Marsico

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Loomis Sayles and Columbia Marsico at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Loomis Sayles and Columbia Marsico into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between Loomis Sayles Inflation and Columbia Marsico Growth, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Loomis Sayles and Columbia Marsico and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Loomis Sayles with a short position of Columbia Marsico. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Loomis Sayles and Columbia Marsico.

Diversification Opportunities for Loomis Sayles and Columbia Marsico

0.08
  Correlation Coefficient

Significant diversification

The 3 months correlation between Loomis and Columbia is 0.08. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Loomis Sayles Inflation and Columbia Marsico Growth in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Columbia Marsico Growth and Loomis Sayles is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Loomis Sayles Inflation are associated (or correlated) with Columbia Marsico. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Columbia Marsico Growth has no effect on the direction of Loomis Sayles i.e., Loomis Sayles and Columbia Marsico go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between Loomis Sayles and Columbia Marsico

Assuming the 90 days horizon Loomis Sayles Inflation is expected to generate 0.83 times more return on investment than Columbia Marsico. However, Loomis Sayles Inflation is 1.21 times less risky than Columbia Marsico. It trades about 0.08 of its potential returns per unit of risk. Columbia Marsico Growth is currently generating about 0.03 per unit of risk. If you would invest  908.00  in Loomis Sayles Inflation on September 14, 2024 and sell it today you would earn a total of  59.00  from holding Loomis Sayles Inflation or generate 6.5% return on investment over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionMoves Together 
StrengthInsignificant
Accuracy100.0%
ValuesDaily Returns

Loomis Sayles Inflation  vs.  Columbia Marsico Growth

 Performance 
       Timeline  
Loomis Sayles Inflation 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

0 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Very Weak
Over the last 90 days Loomis Sayles Inflation has generated negative risk-adjusted returns adding no value to fund investors. In spite of fairly strong basic indicators, Loomis Sayles is not utilizing all of its potentials. The current stock price disturbance, may contribute to short-term losses for the investors.
Columbia Marsico Growth 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

1 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Weak
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Columbia Marsico Growth are ranked lower than 1 (%) of all funds and portfolios of funds over the last 90 days. In spite of fairly strong fundamental indicators, Columbia Marsico is not utilizing all of its potentials. The current stock price disturbance, may contribute to short-term losses for the investors.

Loomis Sayles and Columbia Marsico Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with Loomis Sayles and Columbia Marsico

The main advantage of trading using opposite Loomis Sayles and Columbia Marsico positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Loomis Sayles position performs unexpectedly, Columbia Marsico can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Columbia Marsico will offset losses from the drop in Columbia Marsico's long position.
The idea behind Loomis Sayles Inflation and Columbia Marsico Growth pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Top Crypto Exchanges module to search and analyze digital assets across top global cryptocurrency exchanges.

Other Complementary Tools

Transaction History
View history of all your transactions and understand their impact on performance
Portfolio Holdings
Check your current holdings and cash postion to detemine if your portfolio needs rebalancing
Fundamentals Comparison
Compare fundamentals across multiple equities to find investing opportunities
Equity Analysis
Research over 250,000 global equities including funds, stocks and ETFs to find investment opportunities
Share Portfolio
Track or share privately all of your investments from the convenience of any device