Correlation Between Litigation Capital and Vienna Insurance

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Litigation Capital and Vienna Insurance at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Litigation Capital and Vienna Insurance into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between Litigation Capital Management and Vienna Insurance Group, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Litigation Capital and Vienna Insurance and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Litigation Capital with a short position of Vienna Insurance. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Litigation Capital and Vienna Insurance.

Diversification Opportunities for Litigation Capital and Vienna Insurance

-0.63
  Correlation Coefficient

Excellent diversification

The 3 months correlation between Litigation and Vienna is -0.63. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Litigation Capital Management and Vienna Insurance Group in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Vienna Insurance and Litigation Capital is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Litigation Capital Management are associated (or correlated) with Vienna Insurance. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Vienna Insurance has no effect on the direction of Litigation Capital i.e., Litigation Capital and Vienna Insurance go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between Litigation Capital and Vienna Insurance

Assuming the 90 days trading horizon Litigation Capital Management is expected to generate 2.33 times more return on investment than Vienna Insurance. However, Litigation Capital is 2.33 times more volatile than Vienna Insurance Group. It trades about 0.16 of its potential returns per unit of risk. Vienna Insurance Group is currently generating about -0.04 per unit of risk. If you would invest  9,856  in Litigation Capital Management on August 30, 2024 and sell it today you would earn a total of  1,719  from holding Litigation Capital Management or generate 17.44% return on investment over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionMoves Against 
StrengthWeak
Accuracy97.73%
ValuesDaily Returns

Litigation Capital Management  vs.  Vienna Insurance Group

 Performance 
       Timeline  
Litigation Capital 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

7 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
OK
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Litigation Capital Management are ranked lower than 7 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. In spite of rather uncertain technical and fundamental indicators, Litigation Capital exhibited solid returns over the last few months and may actually be approaching a breakup point.
Vienna Insurance 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

0 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Very Weak
Over the last 90 days Vienna Insurance Group has generated negative risk-adjusted returns adding no value to investors with long positions. In spite of comparatively stable basic indicators, Vienna Insurance is not utilizing all of its potentials. The latest stock price uproar, may contribute to short-horizon losses for the private investors.

Litigation Capital and Vienna Insurance Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with Litigation Capital and Vienna Insurance

The main advantage of trading using opposite Litigation Capital and Vienna Insurance positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Litigation Capital position performs unexpectedly, Vienna Insurance can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Vienna Insurance will offset losses from the drop in Vienna Insurance's long position.
The idea behind Litigation Capital Management and Vienna Insurance Group pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the CEOs Directory module to screen CEOs from public companies around the world.

Other Complementary Tools

Investing Opportunities
Build portfolios using our predefined set of ideas and optimize them against your investing preferences
Price Exposure Probability
Analyze equity upside and downside potential for a given time horizon across multiple markets
Correlation Analysis
Reduce portfolio risk simply by holding instruments which are not perfectly correlated
Economic Indicators
Top statistical indicators that provide insights into how an economy is performing
Global Markets Map
Get a quick overview of global market snapshot using zoomable world map. Drill down to check world indexes