Correlation Between Litigation Capital and Zurich Insurance

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Litigation Capital and Zurich Insurance at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Litigation Capital and Zurich Insurance into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between Litigation Capital Management and Zurich Insurance Group, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Litigation Capital and Zurich Insurance and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Litigation Capital with a short position of Zurich Insurance. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Litigation Capital and Zurich Insurance.

Diversification Opportunities for Litigation Capital and Zurich Insurance

-0.32
  Correlation Coefficient

Very good diversification

The 3 months correlation between Litigation and Zurich is -0.32. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Litigation Capital Management and Zurich Insurance Group in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Zurich Insurance and Litigation Capital is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Litigation Capital Management are associated (or correlated) with Zurich Insurance. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Zurich Insurance has no effect on the direction of Litigation Capital i.e., Litigation Capital and Zurich Insurance go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between Litigation Capital and Zurich Insurance

Assuming the 90 days trading horizon Litigation Capital Management is expected to under-perform the Zurich Insurance. In addition to that, Litigation Capital is 2.55 times more volatile than Zurich Insurance Group. It trades about -0.4 of its total potential returns per unit of risk. Zurich Insurance Group is currently generating about 0.11 per unit of volatility. If you would invest  54,760  in Zurich Insurance Group on November 9, 2024 and sell it today you would earn a total of  1,260  from holding Zurich Insurance Group or generate 2.3% return on investment over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionMoves Against 
StrengthInsignificant
Accuracy100.0%
ValuesDaily Returns

Litigation Capital Management  vs.  Zurich Insurance Group

 Performance 
       Timeline  
Litigation Capital 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

Very Weak

 
Weak
 
Strong
Over the last 90 days Litigation Capital Management has generated negative risk-adjusted returns adding no value to investors with long positions. In spite of uncertain performance in the last few months, the Stock's technical and fundamental indicators remain rather sound which may send shares a bit higher in March 2025. The latest tumult may also be a sign of longer-term up-swing for the firm shareholders.
Zurich Insurance 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

Good

 
Weak
 
Strong
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Zurich Insurance Group are ranked lower than 10 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. In spite of comparatively uncertain basic indicators, Zurich Insurance may actually be approaching a critical reversion point that can send shares even higher in March 2025.

Litigation Capital and Zurich Insurance Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with Litigation Capital and Zurich Insurance

The main advantage of trading using opposite Litigation Capital and Zurich Insurance positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Litigation Capital position performs unexpectedly, Zurich Insurance can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Zurich Insurance will offset losses from the drop in Zurich Insurance's long position.
The idea behind Litigation Capital Management and Zurich Insurance Group pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Aroon Oscillator module to analyze current equity momentum using Aroon Oscillator and other momentum ratios.

Other Complementary Tools

Watchlist Optimization
Optimize watchlists to build efficient portfolios or rebalance existing positions based on the mean-variance optimization algorithm
Pattern Recognition
Use different Pattern Recognition models to time the market across multiple global exchanges
ETFs
Find actively traded Exchange Traded Funds (ETF) from around the world
Options Analysis
Analyze and evaluate options and option chains as a potential hedge for your portfolios
Idea Breakdown
Analyze constituents of all Macroaxis ideas. Macroaxis investment ideas are predefined, sector-focused investing themes