Correlation Between Litigation Capital and Home Depot

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Litigation Capital and Home Depot at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Litigation Capital and Home Depot into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between Litigation Capital Management and Home Depot, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Litigation Capital and Home Depot and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Litigation Capital with a short position of Home Depot. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Litigation Capital and Home Depot.

Diversification Opportunities for Litigation Capital and Home Depot

0.09
  Correlation Coefficient

Significant diversification

The 3 months correlation between Litigation and Home is 0.09. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Litigation Capital Management and Home Depot in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Home Depot and Litigation Capital is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Litigation Capital Management are associated (or correlated) with Home Depot. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Home Depot has no effect on the direction of Litigation Capital i.e., Litigation Capital and Home Depot go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between Litigation Capital and Home Depot

Assuming the 90 days trading horizon Litigation Capital Management is expected to generate 7.13 times more return on investment than Home Depot. However, Litigation Capital is 7.13 times more volatile than Home Depot. It trades about 0.04 of its potential returns per unit of risk. Home Depot is currently generating about 0.08 per unit of risk. If you would invest  9,727  in Litigation Capital Management on August 29, 2024 and sell it today you would earn a total of  1,848  from holding Litigation Capital Management or generate 19.0% return on investment over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionMoves Together 
StrengthInsignificant
Accuracy98.63%
ValuesDaily Returns

Litigation Capital Management  vs.  Home Depot

 Performance 
       Timeline  
Litigation Capital 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

7 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
OK
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Litigation Capital Management are ranked lower than 7 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. In spite of rather unsteady technical and fundamental indicators, Litigation Capital exhibited solid returns over the last few months and may actually be approaching a breakup point.
Home Depot 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

0 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Very Weak
Over the last 90 days Home Depot has generated negative risk-adjusted returns adding no value to investors with long positions. Despite quite persistent essential indicators, Home Depot is not utilizing all of its potentials. The latest stock price mess, may contribute to short-term losses for the institutional investors.

Litigation Capital and Home Depot Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with Litigation Capital and Home Depot

The main advantage of trading using opposite Litigation Capital and Home Depot positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Litigation Capital position performs unexpectedly, Home Depot can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Home Depot will offset losses from the drop in Home Depot's long position.
The idea behind Litigation Capital Management and Home Depot pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Stocks Directory module to find actively traded stocks across global markets.

Other Complementary Tools

Transaction History
View history of all your transactions and understand their impact on performance
Crypto Correlations
Use cryptocurrency correlation module to diversify your cryptocurrency portfolio across multiple coins
Odds Of Bankruptcy
Get analysis of equity chance of financial distress in the next 2 years
Portfolio Volatility
Check portfolio volatility and analyze historical return density to properly model market risk
Investing Opportunities
Build portfolios using our predefined set of ideas and optimize them against your investing preferences