Correlation Between Litigation Capital and Associated British

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Litigation Capital and Associated British at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Litigation Capital and Associated British into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between Litigation Capital Management and Associated British Foods, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Litigation Capital and Associated British and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Litigation Capital with a short position of Associated British. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Litigation Capital and Associated British.

Diversification Opportunities for Litigation Capital and Associated British

-0.16
  Correlation Coefficient

Good diversification

The 3 months correlation between Litigation and Associated is -0.16. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Litigation Capital Management and Associated British Foods in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Associated British Foods and Litigation Capital is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Litigation Capital Management are associated (or correlated) with Associated British. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Associated British Foods has no effect on the direction of Litigation Capital i.e., Litigation Capital and Associated British go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between Litigation Capital and Associated British

Assuming the 90 days trading horizon Litigation Capital Management is expected to generate 1.8 times more return on investment than Associated British. However, Litigation Capital is 1.8 times more volatile than Associated British Foods. It trades about 0.06 of its potential returns per unit of risk. Associated British Foods is currently generating about 0.06 per unit of risk. If you would invest  6,459  in Litigation Capital Management on August 30, 2024 and sell it today you would earn a total of  5,116  from holding Litigation Capital Management or generate 79.21% return on investment over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionMoves Against 
StrengthInsignificant
Accuracy100.0%
ValuesDaily Returns

Litigation Capital Management  vs.  Associated British Foods

 Performance 
       Timeline  
Litigation Capital 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

7 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
OK
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Litigation Capital Management are ranked lower than 7 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. In spite of rather unsteady technical and fundamental indicators, Litigation Capital exhibited solid returns over the last few months and may actually be approaching a breakup point.
Associated British Foods 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

0 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Very Weak
Over the last 90 days Associated British Foods has generated negative risk-adjusted returns adding no value to investors with long positions. In spite of latest uncertain performance, the Stock's technical and fundamental indicators remain sound and the latest tumult on Wall Street may also be a sign of longer-term gains for the firm shareholders.

Litigation Capital and Associated British Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with Litigation Capital and Associated British

The main advantage of trading using opposite Litigation Capital and Associated British positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Litigation Capital position performs unexpectedly, Associated British can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Associated British will offset losses from the drop in Associated British's long position.
The idea behind Litigation Capital Management and Associated British Foods pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the USA ETFs module to find actively traded Exchange Traded Funds (ETF) in USA.

Other Complementary Tools

Global Correlations
Find global opportunities by holding instruments from different markets
Efficient Frontier
Plot and analyze your portfolio and positions against risk-return landscape of the market.
Portfolio Volatility
Check portfolio volatility and analyze historical return density to properly model market risk
Piotroski F Score
Get Piotroski F Score based on the binary analysis strategy of nine different fundamentals
Portfolio Holdings
Check your current holdings and cash postion to detemine if your portfolio needs rebalancing