Correlation Between Lloyds Banking and Sino AG

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Lloyds Banking and Sino AG at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Lloyds Banking and Sino AG into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between Lloyds Banking Group and Sino AG, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Lloyds Banking and Sino AG and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Lloyds Banking with a short position of Sino AG. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Lloyds Banking and Sino AG.

Diversification Opportunities for Lloyds Banking and Sino AG

-0.45
  Correlation Coefficient

Very good diversification

The 3 months correlation between Lloyds and Sino is -0.45. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Lloyds Banking Group and Sino AG in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Sino AG and Lloyds Banking is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Lloyds Banking Group are associated (or correlated) with Sino AG. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Sino AG has no effect on the direction of Lloyds Banking i.e., Lloyds Banking and Sino AG go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between Lloyds Banking and Sino AG

Assuming the 90 days trading horizon Lloyds Banking is expected to generate 2.5 times less return on investment than Sino AG. But when comparing it to its historical volatility, Lloyds Banking Group is 1.06 times less risky than Sino AG. It trades about 0.04 of its potential returns per unit of risk. Sino AG is currently generating about 0.09 of returns per unit of risk over similar time horizon. If you would invest  2,405  in Sino AG on September 2, 2024 and sell it today you would earn a total of  3,945  from holding Sino AG or generate 164.03% return on investment over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionMoves Against 
StrengthVery Weak
Accuracy99.8%
ValuesDaily Returns

Lloyds Banking Group  vs.  Sino AG

 Performance 
       Timeline  
Lloyds Banking Group 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

0 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Very Weak
Over the last 90 days Lloyds Banking Group has generated negative risk-adjusted returns adding no value to investors with long positions. Despite nearly stable fundamental indicators, Lloyds Banking is not utilizing all of its potentials. The current stock price disturbance, may contribute to mid-run losses for the stockholders.
Sino AG 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

9 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
OK
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Sino AG are ranked lower than 9 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. Despite nearly uncertain basic indicators, Sino AG reported solid returns over the last few months and may actually be approaching a breakup point.

Lloyds Banking and Sino AG Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with Lloyds Banking and Sino AG

The main advantage of trading using opposite Lloyds Banking and Sino AG positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Lloyds Banking position performs unexpectedly, Sino AG can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Sino AG will offset losses from the drop in Sino AG's long position.
The idea behind Lloyds Banking Group and Sino AG pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Price Exposure Probability module to analyze equity upside and downside potential for a given time horizon across multiple markets.

Other Complementary Tools

Price Ceiling Movement
Calculate and plot Price Ceiling Movement for different equity instruments
Money Managers
Screen money managers from public funds and ETFs managed around the world
Portfolio Optimization
Compute new portfolio that will generate highest expected return given your specified tolerance for risk
Sign In To Macroaxis
Sign in to explore Macroaxis' wealth optimization platform and fintech modules
Portfolio Comparator
Compare the composition, asset allocations and performance of any two portfolios in your account