Correlation Between London Security and Mobilezone Holding

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both London Security and Mobilezone Holding at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining London Security and Mobilezone Holding into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between London Security Plc and mobilezone holding AG, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on London Security and Mobilezone Holding and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in London Security with a short position of Mobilezone Holding. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of London Security and Mobilezone Holding.

Diversification Opportunities for London Security and Mobilezone Holding

-0.67
  Correlation Coefficient

Excellent diversification

The 3 months correlation between London and Mobilezone is -0.67. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding London Security Plc and mobilezone holding AG in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on mobilezone holding and London Security is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on London Security Plc are associated (or correlated) with Mobilezone Holding. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of mobilezone holding has no effect on the direction of London Security i.e., London Security and Mobilezone Holding go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between London Security and Mobilezone Holding

Assuming the 90 days trading horizon London Security Plc is expected to generate 1.1 times more return on investment than Mobilezone Holding. However, London Security is 1.1 times more volatile than mobilezone holding AG. It trades about 0.03 of its potential returns per unit of risk. mobilezone holding AG is currently generating about -0.02 per unit of risk. If you would invest  282,151  in London Security Plc on September 3, 2024 and sell it today you would earn a total of  42,849  from holding London Security Plc or generate 15.19% return on investment over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionMoves Against 
StrengthWeak
Accuracy99.58%
ValuesDaily Returns

London Security Plc  vs.  mobilezone holding AG

 Performance 
       Timeline  
London Security Plc 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

0 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Very Weak
Over the last 90 days London Security Plc has generated negative risk-adjusted returns adding no value to investors with long positions. In spite of unsteady performance in the last few months, the Stock's technical and fundamental indicators remain rather sound which may send shares a bit higher in January 2025. The latest tumult may also be a sign of longer-term up-swing for the firm shareholders.
mobilezone holding 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

7 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
OK
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in mobilezone holding AG are ranked lower than 7 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. In spite of comparatively stable basic indicators, Mobilezone Holding is not utilizing all of its potentials. The latest stock price uproar, may contribute to short-horizon losses for the private investors.

London Security and Mobilezone Holding Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with London Security and Mobilezone Holding

The main advantage of trading using opposite London Security and Mobilezone Holding positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if London Security position performs unexpectedly, Mobilezone Holding can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Mobilezone Holding will offset losses from the drop in Mobilezone Holding's long position.
The idea behind London Security Plc and mobilezone holding AG pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Positions Ratings module to determine portfolio positions ratings based on digital equity recommendations. Macroaxis instant position ratings are based on combination of fundamental analysis and risk-adjusted market performance.

Other Complementary Tools

Investing Opportunities
Build portfolios using our predefined set of ideas and optimize them against your investing preferences
Watchlist Optimization
Optimize watchlists to build efficient portfolios or rebalance existing positions based on the mean-variance optimization algorithm
Portfolio Suggestion
Get suggestions outside of your existing asset allocation including your own model portfolios
Bollinger Bands
Use Bollinger Bands indicator to analyze target price for a given investing horizon
Bonds Directory
Find actively traded corporate debentures issued by US companies