Correlation Between Maple Leaf and ON SEMICONDUCTOR

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Maple Leaf and ON SEMICONDUCTOR at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Maple Leaf and ON SEMICONDUCTOR into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between Maple Leaf Foods and ON SEMICONDUCTOR, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Maple Leaf and ON SEMICONDUCTOR and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Maple Leaf with a short position of ON SEMICONDUCTOR. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Maple Leaf and ON SEMICONDUCTOR.

Diversification Opportunities for Maple Leaf and ON SEMICONDUCTOR

0.32
  Correlation Coefficient

Weak diversification

The 3 months correlation between Maple and XS4 is 0.32. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Maple Leaf Foods and ON SEMICONDUCTOR in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on ON SEMICONDUCTOR and Maple Leaf is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Maple Leaf Foods are associated (or correlated) with ON SEMICONDUCTOR. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of ON SEMICONDUCTOR has no effect on the direction of Maple Leaf i.e., Maple Leaf and ON SEMICONDUCTOR go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between Maple Leaf and ON SEMICONDUCTOR

Assuming the 90 days trading horizon Maple Leaf Foods is expected to generate 0.65 times more return on investment than ON SEMICONDUCTOR. However, Maple Leaf Foods is 1.53 times less risky than ON SEMICONDUCTOR. It trades about 0.08 of its potential returns per unit of risk. ON SEMICONDUCTOR is currently generating about -0.35 per unit of risk. If you would invest  1,360  in Maple Leaf Foods on November 6, 2024 and sell it today you would earn a total of  40.00  from holding Maple Leaf Foods or generate 2.94% return on investment over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionMoves Together 
StrengthVery Weak
Accuracy100.0%
ValuesDaily Returns

Maple Leaf Foods  vs.  ON SEMICONDUCTOR

 Performance 
       Timeline  
Maple Leaf Foods 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

0 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Very Weak
Over the last 90 days Maple Leaf Foods has generated negative risk-adjusted returns adding no value to investors with long positions. In spite of comparatively stable basic indicators, Maple Leaf is not utilizing all of its potentials. The latest stock price uproar, may contribute to short-horizon losses for the private investors.
ON SEMICONDUCTOR 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

0 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Very Weak
Over the last 90 days ON SEMICONDUCTOR has generated negative risk-adjusted returns adding no value to investors with long positions. In spite of fragile performance in the last few months, the Stock's basic indicators remain comparatively stable which may send shares a bit higher in March 2025. The newest uproar may also be a sign of mid-term up-swing for the firm private investors.

Maple Leaf and ON SEMICONDUCTOR Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with Maple Leaf and ON SEMICONDUCTOR

The main advantage of trading using opposite Maple Leaf and ON SEMICONDUCTOR positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Maple Leaf position performs unexpectedly, ON SEMICONDUCTOR can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in ON SEMICONDUCTOR will offset losses from the drop in ON SEMICONDUCTOR's long position.
The idea behind Maple Leaf Foods and ON SEMICONDUCTOR pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Portfolio Manager module to state of the art Portfolio Manager to monitor and improve performance of your invested capital.

Other Complementary Tools

My Watchlist Analysis
Analyze my current watchlist and to refresh optimization strategy. Macroaxis watchlist is based on self-learning algorithm to remember stocks you like
Portfolio File Import
Quickly import all of your third-party portfolios from your local drive in csv format
Price Exposure Probability
Analyze equity upside and downside potential for a given time horizon across multiple markets
Price Ceiling Movement
Calculate and plot Price Ceiling Movement for different equity instruments
Fundamental Analysis
View fundamental data based on most recent published financial statements