Correlation Between Mitchells Butlers and Universal Health

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Mitchells Butlers and Universal Health at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Mitchells Butlers and Universal Health into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between Mitchells Butlers PLC and Universal Health Services, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Mitchells Butlers and Universal Health and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Mitchells Butlers with a short position of Universal Health. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Mitchells Butlers and Universal Health.

Diversification Opportunities for Mitchells Butlers and Universal Health

0.84
  Correlation Coefficient

Very poor diversification

The 3 months correlation between Mitchells and Universal is 0.84. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Mitchells Butlers PLC and Universal Health Services in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Universal Health Services and Mitchells Butlers is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Mitchells Butlers PLC are associated (or correlated) with Universal Health. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Universal Health Services has no effect on the direction of Mitchells Butlers i.e., Mitchells Butlers and Universal Health go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between Mitchells Butlers and Universal Health

Assuming the 90 days trading horizon Mitchells Butlers PLC is expected to under-perform the Universal Health. In addition to that, Mitchells Butlers is 1.76 times more volatile than Universal Health Services. It trades about -0.06 of its total potential returns per unit of risk. Universal Health Services is currently generating about -0.1 per unit of volatility. If you would invest  20,903  in Universal Health Services on September 4, 2024 and sell it today you would lose (522.00) from holding Universal Health Services or give up 2.5% of portfolio value over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionMoves Together 
StrengthStrong
Accuracy95.45%
ValuesDaily Returns

Mitchells Butlers PLC  vs.  Universal Health Services

 Performance 
       Timeline  
Mitchells Butlers PLC 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

0 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Very Weak
Over the last 90 days Mitchells Butlers PLC has generated negative risk-adjusted returns adding no value to investors with long positions. In spite of uncertain performance in the last few months, the Stock's technical and fundamental indicators remain rather sound which may send shares a bit higher in January 2025. The latest tumult may also be a sign of longer-term up-swing for the firm shareholders.
Universal Health Services 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

0 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Very Weak
Over the last 90 days Universal Health Services has generated negative risk-adjusted returns adding no value to investors with long positions. In spite of uncertain performance in the last few months, the Stock's basic indicators remain comparatively stable which may send shares a bit higher in January 2025. The newest uproar may also be a sign of mid-term up-swing for the firm private investors.

Mitchells Butlers and Universal Health Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with Mitchells Butlers and Universal Health

The main advantage of trading using opposite Mitchells Butlers and Universal Health positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Mitchells Butlers position performs unexpectedly, Universal Health can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Universal Health will offset losses from the drop in Universal Health's long position.
The idea behind Mitchells Butlers PLC and Universal Health Services pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Instant Ratings module to determine any equity ratings based on digital recommendations. Macroaxis instant equity ratings are based on combination of fundamental analysis and risk-adjusted market performance.

Other Complementary Tools

Portfolio Analyzer
Portfolio analysis module that provides access to portfolio diagnostics and optimization engine
Premium Stories
Follow Macroaxis premium stories from verified contributors across different equity types, categories and coverage scope
Portfolio Manager
State of the art Portfolio Manager to monitor and improve performance of your invested capital
Money Managers
Screen money managers from public funds and ETFs managed around the world
Sectors
List of equity sectors categorizing publicly traded companies based on their primary business activities