Correlation Between Mackenzie Balanced and IShares Core

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Mackenzie Balanced and IShares Core at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Mackenzie Balanced and IShares Core into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between Mackenzie Balanced Allocation and iShares Core Growth, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Mackenzie Balanced and IShares Core and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Mackenzie Balanced with a short position of IShares Core. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Mackenzie Balanced and IShares Core.

Diversification Opportunities for Mackenzie Balanced and IShares Core

0.95
  Correlation Coefficient

Almost no diversification

The 3 months correlation between Mackenzie and IShares is 0.95. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Mackenzie Balanced Allocation and iShares Core Growth in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on iShares Core Growth and Mackenzie Balanced is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Mackenzie Balanced Allocation are associated (or correlated) with IShares Core. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of iShares Core Growth has no effect on the direction of Mackenzie Balanced i.e., Mackenzie Balanced and IShares Core go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between Mackenzie Balanced and IShares Core

Assuming the 90 days trading horizon Mackenzie Balanced is expected to generate 2.03 times less return on investment than IShares Core. But when comparing it to its historical volatility, Mackenzie Balanced Allocation is 1.33 times less risky than IShares Core. It trades about 0.15 of its potential returns per unit of risk. iShares Core Growth is currently generating about 0.22 of returns per unit of risk over similar time horizon. If you would invest  3,000  in iShares Core Growth on August 29, 2024 and sell it today you would earn a total of  71.00  from holding iShares Core Growth or generate 2.37% return on investment over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionMoves Together 
StrengthVery Strong
Accuracy100.0%
ValuesDaily Returns

Mackenzie Balanced Allocation  vs.  iShares Core Growth

 Performance 
       Timeline  
Mackenzie Balanced 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

13 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Good
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Mackenzie Balanced Allocation are ranked lower than 13 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. In spite of very healthy basic indicators, Mackenzie Balanced is not utilizing all of its potentials. The recent stock price disarray, may contribute to short-term losses for the investors.
iShares Core Growth 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

17 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Solid
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in iShares Core Growth are ranked lower than 17 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. In spite of very unfluctuating basic indicators, IShares Core may actually be approaching a critical reversion point that can send shares even higher in December 2024.

Mackenzie Balanced and IShares Core Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with Mackenzie Balanced and IShares Core

The main advantage of trading using opposite Mackenzie Balanced and IShares Core positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Mackenzie Balanced position performs unexpectedly, IShares Core can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in IShares Core will offset losses from the drop in IShares Core's long position.
The idea behind Mackenzie Balanced Allocation and iShares Core Growth pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Money Managers module to screen money managers from public funds and ETFs managed around the world.

Other Complementary Tools

Bond Analysis
Evaluate and analyze corporate bonds as a potential investment for your portfolios.
Technical Analysis
Check basic technical indicators and analysis based on most latest market data
Idea Analyzer
Analyze all characteristics, volatility and risk-adjusted return of Macroaxis ideas
Analyst Advice
Analyst recommendations and target price estimates broken down by several categories
Portfolio Holdings
Check your current holdings and cash postion to detemine if your portfolio needs rebalancing