Correlation Between Matthews China and Invesco Bloomberg

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Matthews China and Invesco Bloomberg at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Matthews China and Invesco Bloomberg into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between Matthews China Discovery and Invesco Bloomberg Pricing, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Matthews China and Invesco Bloomberg and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Matthews China with a short position of Invesco Bloomberg. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Matthews China and Invesco Bloomberg.

Diversification Opportunities for Matthews China and Invesco Bloomberg

-0.16
  Correlation Coefficient

Good diversification

The 3 months correlation between Matthews and Invesco is -0.16. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Matthews China Discovery and Invesco Bloomberg Pricing in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Invesco Bloomberg Pricing and Matthews China is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Matthews China Discovery are associated (or correlated) with Invesco Bloomberg. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Invesco Bloomberg Pricing has no effect on the direction of Matthews China i.e., Matthews China and Invesco Bloomberg go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between Matthews China and Invesco Bloomberg

Given the investment horizon of 90 days Matthews China Discovery is expected to under-perform the Invesco Bloomberg. In addition to that, Matthews China is 1.79 times more volatile than Invesco Bloomberg Pricing. It trades about -0.32 of its total potential returns per unit of risk. Invesco Bloomberg Pricing is currently generating about -0.36 per unit of volatility. If you would invest  8,620  in Invesco Bloomberg Pricing on October 9, 2024 and sell it today you would lose (464.00) from holding Invesco Bloomberg Pricing or give up 5.38% of portfolio value over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionMoves Against 
StrengthInsignificant
Accuracy100.0%
ValuesDaily Returns

Matthews China Discovery  vs.  Invesco Bloomberg Pricing

 Performance 
       Timeline  
Matthews China Discovery 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

0 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Very Weak
Over the last 90 days Matthews China Discovery has generated negative risk-adjusted returns adding no value to investors with long positions. In spite of comparatively stable technical indicators, Matthews China is not utilizing all of its potentials. The newest stock price uproar, may contribute to short-horizon losses for the private investors.
Invesco Bloomberg Pricing 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

0 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Very Weak
Over the last 90 days Invesco Bloomberg Pricing has generated negative risk-adjusted returns adding no value to investors with long positions. Despite somewhat strong basic indicators, Invesco Bloomberg is not utilizing all of its potentials. The newest stock price disturbance, may contribute to short-term losses for the investors.

Matthews China and Invesco Bloomberg Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with Matthews China and Invesco Bloomberg

The main advantage of trading using opposite Matthews China and Invesco Bloomberg positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Matthews China position performs unexpectedly, Invesco Bloomberg can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Invesco Bloomberg will offset losses from the drop in Invesco Bloomberg's long position.
The idea behind Matthews China Discovery and Invesco Bloomberg Pricing pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the My Watchlist Analysis module to analyze my current watchlist and to refresh optimization strategy. Macroaxis watchlist is based on self-learning algorithm to remember stocks you like.

Other Complementary Tools

Efficient Frontier
Plot and analyze your portfolio and positions against risk-return landscape of the market.
Balance Of Power
Check stock momentum by analyzing Balance Of Power indicator and other technical ratios
Insider Screener
Find insiders across different sectors to evaluate their impact on performance
Equity Search
Search for actively traded equities including funds and ETFs from over 30 global markets
Earnings Calls
Check upcoming earnings announcements updated hourly across public exchanges