Correlation Between Mfs Emerging and Loomis Sayles

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Mfs Emerging and Loomis Sayles at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Mfs Emerging and Loomis Sayles into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between Mfs Emerging Markets and Loomis Sayles Small, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Mfs Emerging and Loomis Sayles and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Mfs Emerging with a short position of Loomis Sayles. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Mfs Emerging and Loomis Sayles.

Diversification Opportunities for Mfs Emerging and Loomis Sayles

-0.13
  Correlation Coefficient

Good diversification

The 3 months correlation between MFS and Loomis is -0.13. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Mfs Emerging Markets and Loomis Sayles Small in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Loomis Sayles Small and Mfs Emerging is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Mfs Emerging Markets are associated (or correlated) with Loomis Sayles. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Loomis Sayles Small has no effect on the direction of Mfs Emerging i.e., Mfs Emerging and Loomis Sayles go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between Mfs Emerging and Loomis Sayles

Assuming the 90 days horizon Mfs Emerging is expected to generate 16.1 times less return on investment than Loomis Sayles. But when comparing it to its historical volatility, Mfs Emerging Markets is 6.06 times less risky than Loomis Sayles. It trades about 0.12 of its potential returns per unit of risk. Loomis Sayles Small is currently generating about 0.32 of returns per unit of risk over similar time horizon. If you would invest  2,969  in Loomis Sayles Small on September 4, 2024 and sell it today you would earn a total of  346.00  from holding Loomis Sayles Small or generate 11.65% return on investment over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionMoves Against 
StrengthInsignificant
Accuracy95.24%
ValuesDaily Returns

Mfs Emerging Markets  vs.  Loomis Sayles Small

 Performance 
       Timeline  
Mfs Emerging Markets 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

2 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Weak
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Mfs Emerging Markets are ranked lower than 2 (%) of all funds and portfolios of funds over the last 90 days. In spite of fairly strong forward indicators, Mfs Emerging is not utilizing all of its potentials. The current stock price disturbance, may contribute to short-term losses for the investors.
Loomis Sayles Small 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

14 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Good
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Loomis Sayles Small are ranked lower than 14 (%) of all funds and portfolios of funds over the last 90 days. In spite of fairly weak basic indicators, Loomis Sayles showed solid returns over the last few months and may actually be approaching a breakup point.

Mfs Emerging and Loomis Sayles Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with Mfs Emerging and Loomis Sayles

The main advantage of trading using opposite Mfs Emerging and Loomis Sayles positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Mfs Emerging position performs unexpectedly, Loomis Sayles can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Loomis Sayles will offset losses from the drop in Loomis Sayles' long position.
The idea behind Mfs Emerging Markets and Loomis Sayles Small pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Fundamental Analysis module to view fundamental data based on most recent published financial statements.

Other Complementary Tools

Pattern Recognition
Use different Pattern Recognition models to time the market across multiple global exchanges
Headlines Timeline
Stay connected to all market stories and filter out noise. Drill down to analyze hype elasticity
Bonds Directory
Find actively traded corporate debentures issued by US companies
Idea Optimizer
Use advanced portfolio builder with pre-computed micro ideas to build optimal portfolio
Volatility Analysis
Get historical volatility and risk analysis based on latest market data