Correlation Between Mfs Emerging and Emerging Growth

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Mfs Emerging and Emerging Growth at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Mfs Emerging and Emerging Growth into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between Mfs Emerging Markets and Emerging Growth Fund, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Mfs Emerging and Emerging Growth and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Mfs Emerging with a short position of Emerging Growth. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Mfs Emerging and Emerging Growth.

Diversification Opportunities for Mfs Emerging and Emerging Growth

-0.16
  Correlation Coefficient

Good diversification

The 3 months correlation between MFS and Emerging is -0.16. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Mfs Emerging Markets and Emerging Growth Fund in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Emerging Growth and Mfs Emerging is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Mfs Emerging Markets are associated (or correlated) with Emerging Growth. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Emerging Growth has no effect on the direction of Mfs Emerging i.e., Mfs Emerging and Emerging Growth go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between Mfs Emerging and Emerging Growth

Assuming the 90 days horizon Mfs Emerging is expected to generate 1.98 times less return on investment than Emerging Growth. But when comparing it to its historical volatility, Mfs Emerging Markets is 3.91 times less risky than Emerging Growth. It trades about 0.19 of its potential returns per unit of risk. Emerging Growth Fund is currently generating about 0.09 of returns per unit of risk over similar time horizon. If you would invest  1,006  in Emerging Growth Fund on September 4, 2024 and sell it today you would earn a total of  403.00  from holding Emerging Growth Fund or generate 40.06% return on investment over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionMoves Against 
StrengthInsignificant
Accuracy99.66%
ValuesDaily Returns

Mfs Emerging Markets  vs.  Emerging Growth Fund

 Performance 
       Timeline  
Mfs Emerging Markets 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

2 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Weak
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Mfs Emerging Markets are ranked lower than 2 (%) of all funds and portfolios of funds over the last 90 days. In spite of fairly strong forward indicators, Mfs Emerging is not utilizing all of its potentials. The current stock price disturbance, may contribute to short-term losses for the investors.
Emerging Growth 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

15 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Good
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Emerging Growth Fund are ranked lower than 15 (%) of all funds and portfolios of funds over the last 90 days. In spite of fairly weak forward indicators, Emerging Growth showed solid returns over the last few months and may actually be approaching a breakup point.

Mfs Emerging and Emerging Growth Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with Mfs Emerging and Emerging Growth

The main advantage of trading using opposite Mfs Emerging and Emerging Growth positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Mfs Emerging position performs unexpectedly, Emerging Growth can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Emerging Growth will offset losses from the drop in Emerging Growth's long position.
The idea behind Mfs Emerging Markets and Emerging Growth Fund pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Analyst Advice module to analyst recommendations and target price estimates broken down by several categories.

Other Complementary Tools

Aroon Oscillator
Analyze current equity momentum using Aroon Oscillator and other momentum ratios
Portfolio Comparator
Compare the composition, asset allocations and performance of any two portfolios in your account
Options Analysis
Analyze and evaluate options and option chains as a potential hedge for your portfolios
Global Markets Map
Get a quick overview of global market snapshot using zoomable world map. Drill down to check world indexes
Sign In To Macroaxis
Sign in to explore Macroaxis' wealth optimization platform and fintech modules