Correlation Between MetLife and ENERGY

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both MetLife and ENERGY at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining MetLife and ENERGY into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between MetLife and ENERGY TRANSFER OPER, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on MetLife and ENERGY and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in MetLife with a short position of ENERGY. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of MetLife and ENERGY.

Diversification Opportunities for MetLife and ENERGY

-0.52
  Correlation Coefficient

Excellent diversification

The 3 months correlation between MetLife and ENERGY is -0.52. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding MetLife and ENERGY TRANSFER OPER in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on ENERGY TRANSFER OPER and MetLife is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on MetLife are associated (or correlated) with ENERGY. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of ENERGY TRANSFER OPER has no effect on the direction of MetLife i.e., MetLife and ENERGY go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between MetLife and ENERGY

Considering the 90-day investment horizon MetLife is expected to generate 1.4 times more return on investment than ENERGY. However, MetLife is 1.4 times more volatile than ENERGY TRANSFER OPER. It trades about 0.25 of its potential returns per unit of risk. ENERGY TRANSFER OPER is currently generating about -0.2 per unit of risk. If you would invest  7,801  in MetLife on September 5, 2024 and sell it today you would earn a total of  771.00  from holding MetLife or generate 9.88% return on investment over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionMoves Against 
StrengthVery Weak
Accuracy90.91%
ValuesDaily Returns

MetLife  vs.  ENERGY TRANSFER OPER

 Performance 
       Timeline  
MetLife 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

9 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
OK
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in MetLife are ranked lower than 9 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. In spite of comparatively conflicting technical and fundamental indicators, MetLife unveiled solid returns over the last few months and may actually be approaching a breakup point.
ENERGY TRANSFER OPER 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

0 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Very Weak
Over the last 90 days ENERGY TRANSFER OPER has generated negative risk-adjusted returns adding no value to investors with long positions. Despite latest weak performance, the Bond's basic indicators remain strong and the current disturbance on Wall Street may also be a sign of long term gains for ENERGY TRANSFER OPER investors.

MetLife and ENERGY Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with MetLife and ENERGY

The main advantage of trading using opposite MetLife and ENERGY positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if MetLife position performs unexpectedly, ENERGY can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in ENERGY will offset losses from the drop in ENERGY's long position.
MetLife vs. Aflac Incorporated
MetLife vs. Manulife Financial Corp
MetLife vs. Jackson Financial
MetLife vs. CNO Financial Group
The idea behind MetLife and ENERGY TRANSFER OPER pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
ENERGY vs. AEP TEX INC
ENERGY vs. US BANK NATIONAL
ENERGY vs. MetLife
ENERGY vs. Jackson Financial
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Premium Stories module to follow Macroaxis premium stories from verified contributors across different equity types, categories and coverage scope.

Other Complementary Tools

Equity Search
Search for actively traded equities including funds and ETFs from over 30 global markets
Sync Your Broker
Sync your existing holdings, watchlists, positions or portfolios from thousands of online brokerage services, banks, investment account aggregators and robo-advisors.
Headlines Timeline
Stay connected to all market stories and filter out noise. Drill down to analyze hype elasticity
Theme Ratings
Determine theme ratings based on digital equity recommendations. Macroaxis theme ratings are based on combination of fundamental analysis and risk-adjusted market performance
ETFs
Find actively traded Exchange Traded Funds (ETF) from around the world


 
Macroaxis helps investors of all levels and skills to maximize the upside of all their holdings and minimize the risk associated with market volatility, economic swings, and company-specific events. View terms and conditions
 
Feedback Blog
Made with optimal in San Francisco
2024 Macroaxis LLC
COMMON DESTINATIONS
MAIN CATEGORIES
COMPANY