Correlation Between Miller Intermediate and Miller Convertible

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Miller Intermediate and Miller Convertible at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Miller Intermediate and Miller Convertible into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between Miller Intermediate Bond and Miller Vertible Bond, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Miller Intermediate and Miller Convertible and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Miller Intermediate with a short position of Miller Convertible. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Miller Intermediate and Miller Convertible.

Diversification Opportunities for Miller Intermediate and Miller Convertible

0.14
  Correlation Coefficient

Average diversification

The 3 months correlation between Miller and Miller is 0.14. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Miller Intermediate Bond and Miller Vertible Bond in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Miller Vertible Bond and Miller Intermediate is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Miller Intermediate Bond are associated (or correlated) with Miller Convertible. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Miller Vertible Bond has no effect on the direction of Miller Intermediate i.e., Miller Intermediate and Miller Convertible go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between Miller Intermediate and Miller Convertible

Assuming the 90 days horizon Miller Intermediate Bond is expected to generate 1.11 times more return on investment than Miller Convertible. However, Miller Intermediate is 1.11 times more volatile than Miller Vertible Bond. It trades about 0.18 of its potential returns per unit of risk. Miller Vertible Bond is currently generating about 0.15 per unit of risk. If you would invest  2,700  in Miller Intermediate Bond on August 29, 2024 and sell it today you would earn a total of  45.00  from holding Miller Intermediate Bond or generate 1.67% return on investment over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionMoves Together 
StrengthInsignificant
Accuracy100.0%
ValuesDaily Returns

Miller Intermediate Bond  vs.  Miller Vertible Bond

 Performance 
       Timeline  
Miller Intermediate Bond 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

10 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
OK
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Miller Intermediate Bond are ranked lower than 10 (%) of all funds and portfolios of funds over the last 90 days. In spite of fairly strong basic indicators, Miller Intermediate is not utilizing all of its potentials. The current stock price disturbance, may contribute to short-term losses for the investors.
Miller Vertible Bond 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

5 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Modest
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Miller Vertible Bond are ranked lower than 5 (%) of all funds and portfolios of funds over the last 90 days. In spite of fairly strong basic indicators, Miller Convertible is not utilizing all of its potentials. The current stock price disturbance, may contribute to short-term losses for the investors.

Miller Intermediate and Miller Convertible Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with Miller Intermediate and Miller Convertible

The main advantage of trading using opposite Miller Intermediate and Miller Convertible positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Miller Intermediate position performs unexpectedly, Miller Convertible can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Miller Convertible will offset losses from the drop in Miller Convertible's long position.
The idea behind Miller Intermediate Bond and Miller Vertible Bond pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Portfolio Analyzer module to portfolio analysis module that provides access to portfolio diagnostics and optimization engine.

Other Complementary Tools

Portfolio Backtesting
Avoid under-diversification and over-optimization by backtesting your portfolios
Commodity Channel
Use Commodity Channel Index to analyze current equity momentum
USA ETFs
Find actively traded Exchange Traded Funds (ETF) in USA
Bollinger Bands
Use Bollinger Bands indicator to analyze target price for a given investing horizon
Theme Ratings
Determine theme ratings based on digital equity recommendations. Macroaxis theme ratings are based on combination of fundamental analysis and risk-adjusted market performance