Correlation Between Miller Intermediate and Columbia Global

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Miller Intermediate and Columbia Global at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Miller Intermediate and Columbia Global into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between Miller Intermediate Bond and Columbia Global Technology, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Miller Intermediate and Columbia Global and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Miller Intermediate with a short position of Columbia Global. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Miller Intermediate and Columbia Global.

Diversification Opportunities for Miller Intermediate and Columbia Global

0.09
  Correlation Coefficient

Significant diversification

The 3 months correlation between Miller and Columbia is 0.09. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Miller Intermediate Bond and Columbia Global Technology in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Columbia Global Tech and Miller Intermediate is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Miller Intermediate Bond are associated (or correlated) with Columbia Global. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Columbia Global Tech has no effect on the direction of Miller Intermediate i.e., Miller Intermediate and Columbia Global go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between Miller Intermediate and Columbia Global

Assuming the 90 days horizon Miller Intermediate is expected to generate 2.74 times less return on investment than Columbia Global. But when comparing it to its historical volatility, Miller Intermediate Bond is 5.24 times less risky than Columbia Global. It trades about 0.08 of its potential returns per unit of risk. Columbia Global Technology is currently generating about 0.04 of returns per unit of risk over similar time horizon. If you would invest  7,862  in Columbia Global Technology on December 4, 2024 and sell it today you would earn a total of  1,013  from holding Columbia Global Technology or generate 12.88% return on investment over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionMoves Together 
StrengthInsignificant
Accuracy99.59%
ValuesDaily Returns

Miller Intermediate Bond  vs.  Columbia Global Technology

 Performance 
       Timeline  
Miller Intermediate Bond 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

Very Weak

 
Weak
 
Strong
Over the last 90 days Miller Intermediate Bond has generated negative risk-adjusted returns adding no value to fund investors. In spite of fairly strong forward indicators, Miller Intermediate is not utilizing all of its potentials. The current stock price disturbance, may contribute to short-term losses for the investors.
Columbia Global Tech 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

Very Weak

 
Weak
 
Strong
Over the last 90 days Columbia Global Technology has generated negative risk-adjusted returns adding no value to fund investors. In spite of latest weak performance, the Fund's technical and fundamental indicators remain strong and the current disturbance on Wall Street may also be a sign of long term gains for the fund investors.

Miller Intermediate and Columbia Global Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with Miller Intermediate and Columbia Global

The main advantage of trading using opposite Miller Intermediate and Columbia Global positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Miller Intermediate position performs unexpectedly, Columbia Global can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Columbia Global will offset losses from the drop in Columbia Global's long position.
The idea behind Miller Intermediate Bond and Columbia Global Technology pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Analyst Advice module to analyst recommendations and target price estimates broken down by several categories.

Other Complementary Tools

Pair Correlation
Compare performance and examine fundamental relationship between any two equity instruments
Sectors
List of equity sectors categorizing publicly traded companies based on their primary business activities
Transaction History
View history of all your transactions and understand their impact on performance
Portfolio Rebalancing
Analyze risk-adjusted returns against different time horizons to find asset-allocation targets
Aroon Oscillator
Analyze current equity momentum using Aroon Oscillator and other momentum ratios