Correlation Between McCormick Company and FitLife Brands,

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both McCormick Company and FitLife Brands, at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining McCormick Company and FitLife Brands, into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between McCormick Company Incorporated and FitLife Brands, Common, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on McCormick Company and FitLife Brands, and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in McCormick Company with a short position of FitLife Brands,. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of McCormick Company and FitLife Brands,.

Diversification Opportunities for McCormick Company and FitLife Brands,

0.33
  Correlation Coefficient

Weak diversification

The 3 months correlation between McCormick and FitLife is 0.33. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding McCormick Company Incorporated and FitLife Brands, Common in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on FitLife Brands, Common and McCormick Company is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on McCormick Company Incorporated are associated (or correlated) with FitLife Brands,. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of FitLife Brands, Common has no effect on the direction of McCormick Company i.e., McCormick Company and FitLife Brands, go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between McCormick Company and FitLife Brands,

Assuming the 90 days horizon McCormick Company Incorporated is expected to under-perform the FitLife Brands,. But the preferred stock apears to be less risky and, when comparing its historical volatility, McCormick Company Incorporated is 1.46 times less risky than FitLife Brands,. The preferred stock trades about -0.01 of its potential returns per unit of risk. The FitLife Brands, Common is currently generating about 0.08 of returns per unit of risk over similar time horizon. If you would invest  1,600  in FitLife Brands, Common on August 31, 2024 and sell it today you would earn a total of  1,773  from holding FitLife Brands, Common or generate 110.81% return on investment over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionMoves Together 
StrengthVery Weak
Accuracy99.47%
ValuesDaily Returns

McCormick Company Incorporated  vs.  FitLife Brands, Common

 Performance 
       Timeline  
McCormick Company 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

0 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Very Weak
Over the last 90 days McCormick Company Incorporated has generated negative risk-adjusted returns adding no value to investors with long positions. In spite of fairly stable basic indicators, McCormick Company is not utilizing all of its potentials. The newest stock price fuss, may contribute to near-short-term losses for the sophisticated investors.
FitLife Brands, Common 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

1 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Weak
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in FitLife Brands, Common are ranked lower than 1 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. Despite nearly stable essential indicators, FitLife Brands, is not utilizing all of its potentials. The recent stock price disturbance, may contribute to mid-run losses for the stockholders.

McCormick Company and FitLife Brands, Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with McCormick Company and FitLife Brands,

The main advantage of trading using opposite McCormick Company and FitLife Brands, positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if McCormick Company position performs unexpectedly, FitLife Brands, can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in FitLife Brands, will offset losses from the drop in FitLife Brands,'s long position.
The idea behind McCormick Company Incorporated and FitLife Brands, Common pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Sync Your Broker module to sync your existing holdings, watchlists, positions or portfolios from thousands of online brokerage services, banks, investment account aggregators and robo-advisors..

Other Complementary Tools

Funds Screener
Find actively-traded funds from around the world traded on over 30 global exchanges
Economic Indicators
Top statistical indicators that provide insights into how an economy is performing
Portfolio Analyzer
Portfolio analysis module that provides access to portfolio diagnostics and optimization engine
Odds Of Bankruptcy
Get analysis of equity chance of financial distress in the next 2 years
Alpha Finder
Use alpha and beta coefficients to find investment opportunities after accounting for the risk