Correlation Between Ming Le and Fukuyama Transporting
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Ming Le and Fukuyama Transporting at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Ming Le and Fukuyama Transporting into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between Ming Le Sports and Fukuyama Transporting Co, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Ming Le and Fukuyama Transporting and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Ming Le with a short position of Fukuyama Transporting. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Ming Le and Fukuyama Transporting.
Diversification Opportunities for Ming Le and Fukuyama Transporting
-0.72 | Correlation Coefficient |
Pay attention - limited upside
The 3 months correlation between Ming and Fukuyama is -0.72. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Ming Le Sports and Fukuyama Transporting Co in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Fukuyama Transporting and Ming Le is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Ming Le Sports are associated (or correlated) with Fukuyama Transporting. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Fukuyama Transporting has no effect on the direction of Ming Le i.e., Ming Le and Fukuyama Transporting go up and down completely randomly.
Pair Corralation between Ming Le and Fukuyama Transporting
Assuming the 90 days trading horizon Ming Le Sports is expected to generate 1.2 times more return on investment than Fukuyama Transporting. However, Ming Le is 1.2 times more volatile than Fukuyama Transporting Co. It trades about 0.03 of its potential returns per unit of risk. Fukuyama Transporting Co is currently generating about 0.03 per unit of risk. If you would invest 129.00 in Ming Le Sports on August 25, 2024 and sell it today you would earn a total of 17.00 from holding Ming Le Sports or generate 13.18% return on investment over 90 days.
| Time Period | 3 Months [change] |
| Direction | Moves Against |
| Strength | Weak |
| Accuracy | 100.0% |
| Values | Daily Returns |
Ming Le Sports vs. Fukuyama Transporting Co
Performance |
| Timeline |
| Ming Le Sports |
| Fukuyama Transporting |
Ming Le and Fukuyama Transporting Volatility Contrast
Predicted Return Density |
| Returns |
Pair Trading with Ming Le and Fukuyama Transporting
The main advantage of trading using opposite Ming Le and Fukuyama Transporting positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Ming Le position performs unexpectedly, Fukuyama Transporting can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Fukuyama Transporting will offset losses from the drop in Fukuyama Transporting's long position.The idea behind Ming Le Sports and Fukuyama Transporting Co pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.| Fukuyama Transporting vs. Heartland Express | Fukuyama Transporting vs. Superior Plus Corp | Fukuyama Transporting vs. NMI Holdings | Fukuyama Transporting vs. Origin Agritech |
Check out your portfolio center.Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Bond Analysis module to evaluate and analyze corporate bonds as a potential investment for your portfolios..
Other Complementary Tools
| Bollinger Bands Use Bollinger Bands indicator to analyze target price for a given investing horizon | |
| Stocks Directory Find actively traded stocks across global markets | |
| Portfolio Suggestion Get suggestions outside of your existing asset allocation including your own model portfolios | |
| Bond Analysis Evaluate and analyze corporate bonds as a potential investment for your portfolios. | |
| Global Markets Map Get a quick overview of global market snapshot using zoomable world map. Drill down to check world indexes |