Correlation Between Ming Le and General Mills

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Ming Le and General Mills at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Ming Le and General Mills into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between Ming Le Sports and General Mills, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Ming Le and General Mills and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Ming Le with a short position of General Mills. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Ming Le and General Mills.

Diversification Opportunities for Ming Le and General Mills

0.6
  Correlation Coefficient

Poor diversification

The 3 months correlation between Ming and General is 0.6. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Ming Le Sports and General Mills in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on General Mills and Ming Le is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Ming Le Sports are associated (or correlated) with General Mills. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of General Mills has no effect on the direction of Ming Le i.e., Ming Le and General Mills go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between Ming Le and General Mills

Assuming the 90 days trading horizon Ming Le is expected to generate 79.08 times less return on investment than General Mills. In addition to that, Ming Le is 1.68 times more volatile than General Mills. It trades about 0.0 of its total potential returns per unit of risk. General Mills is currently generating about 0.06 per unit of volatility. If you would invest  7,060  in General Mills on September 12, 2024 and sell it today you would earn a total of  1,787  from holding General Mills or generate 25.31% return on investment over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionMoves Together 
StrengthSignificant
Accuracy100.0%
ValuesDaily Returns

Ming Le Sports  vs.  General Mills

 Performance 
       Timeline  
Ming Le Sports 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

7 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
OK
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Ming Le Sports are ranked lower than 7 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. In spite of comparatively uncertain basic indicators, Ming Le unveiled solid returns over the last few months and may actually be approaching a breakup point.
General Mills 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

12 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Good
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in General Mills are ranked lower than 12 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. Despite nearly fragile basic indicators, General Mills reported solid returns over the last few months and may actually be approaching a breakup point.

Ming Le and General Mills Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with Ming Le and General Mills

The main advantage of trading using opposite Ming Le and General Mills positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Ming Le position performs unexpectedly, General Mills can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in General Mills will offset losses from the drop in General Mills' long position.
The idea behind Ming Le Sports and General Mills pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Commodity Channel module to use Commodity Channel Index to analyze current equity momentum.

Other Complementary Tools

Technical Analysis
Check basic technical indicators and analysis based on most latest market data
Stocks Directory
Find actively traded stocks across global markets
Efficient Frontier
Plot and analyze your portfolio and positions against risk-return landscape of the market.
Portfolio Backtesting
Avoid under-diversification and over-optimization by backtesting your portfolios
Price Ceiling Movement
Calculate and plot Price Ceiling Movement for different equity instruments