Correlation Between Ming Le and Texas Roadhouse

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Ming Le and Texas Roadhouse at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Ming Le and Texas Roadhouse into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between Ming Le Sports and Texas Roadhouse, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Ming Le and Texas Roadhouse and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Ming Le with a short position of Texas Roadhouse. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Ming Le and Texas Roadhouse.

Diversification Opportunities for Ming Le and Texas Roadhouse

0.4
  Correlation Coefficient

Very weak diversification

The 3 months correlation between Ming and Texas is 0.4. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Ming Le Sports and Texas Roadhouse in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Texas Roadhouse and Ming Le is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Ming Le Sports are associated (or correlated) with Texas Roadhouse. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Texas Roadhouse has no effect on the direction of Ming Le i.e., Ming Le and Texas Roadhouse go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between Ming Le and Texas Roadhouse

Assuming the 90 days trading horizon Ming Le is expected to generate 2.77 times less return on investment than Texas Roadhouse. In addition to that, Ming Le is 1.62 times more volatile than Texas Roadhouse. It trades about 0.03 of its total potential returns per unit of risk. Texas Roadhouse is currently generating about 0.14 per unit of volatility. If you would invest  10,894  in Texas Roadhouse on August 25, 2024 and sell it today you would earn a total of  7,496  from holding Texas Roadhouse or generate 68.81% return on investment over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionMoves Together 
StrengthWeak
Accuracy100.0%
ValuesDaily Returns

Ming Le Sports  vs.  Texas Roadhouse

 Performance 
       Timeline  
Ming Le Sports 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

9 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
OK
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Ming Le Sports are ranked lower than 9 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. In spite of comparatively uncertain basic indicators, Ming Le unveiled solid returns over the last few months and may actually be approaching a breakup point.
Texas Roadhouse 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

13 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Good
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Texas Roadhouse are ranked lower than 13 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. Despite nearly uncertain basic indicators, Texas Roadhouse reported solid returns over the last few months and may actually be approaching a breakup point.

Ming Le and Texas Roadhouse Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with Ming Le and Texas Roadhouse

The main advantage of trading using opposite Ming Le and Texas Roadhouse positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Ming Le position performs unexpectedly, Texas Roadhouse can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Texas Roadhouse will offset losses from the drop in Texas Roadhouse's long position.
The idea behind Ming Le Sports and Texas Roadhouse pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Portfolio File Import module to quickly import all of your third-party portfolios from your local drive in csv format.

Other Complementary Tools

Aroon Oscillator
Analyze current equity momentum using Aroon Oscillator and other momentum ratios
Top Crypto Exchanges
Search and analyze digital assets across top global cryptocurrency exchanges
Idea Optimizer
Use advanced portfolio builder with pre-computed micro ideas to build optimal portfolio
Idea Analyzer
Analyze all characteristics, volatility and risk-adjusted return of Macroaxis ideas
Portfolio Manager
State of the art Portfolio Manager to monitor and improve performance of your invested capital