Correlation Between Cohen Steers and Fidelity Advisor

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Cohen Steers and Fidelity Advisor at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Cohen Steers and Fidelity Advisor into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between Cohen Steers Mlp and Fidelity Advisor Energy, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Cohen Steers and Fidelity Advisor and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Cohen Steers with a short position of Fidelity Advisor. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Cohen Steers and Fidelity Advisor.

Diversification Opportunities for Cohen Steers and Fidelity Advisor

0.92
  Correlation Coefficient

Almost no diversification

The 3 months correlation between Cohen and Fidelity is 0.92. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Cohen Steers Mlp and Fidelity Advisor Energy in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Fidelity Advisor Energy and Cohen Steers is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Cohen Steers Mlp are associated (or correlated) with Fidelity Advisor. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Fidelity Advisor Energy has no effect on the direction of Cohen Steers i.e., Cohen Steers and Fidelity Advisor go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between Cohen Steers and Fidelity Advisor

Assuming the 90 days horizon Cohen Steers Mlp is expected to generate 0.64 times more return on investment than Fidelity Advisor. However, Cohen Steers Mlp is 1.56 times less risky than Fidelity Advisor. It trades about 0.06 of its potential returns per unit of risk. Fidelity Advisor Energy is currently generating about 0.03 per unit of risk. If you would invest  728.00  in Cohen Steers Mlp on September 4, 2024 and sell it today you would earn a total of  196.00  from holding Cohen Steers Mlp or generate 26.92% return on investment over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionMoves Together 
StrengthVery Strong
Accuracy100.0%
ValuesDaily Returns

Cohen Steers Mlp  vs.  Fidelity Advisor Energy

 Performance 
       Timeline  
Cohen Steers Mlp 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

14 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Good
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Cohen Steers Mlp are ranked lower than 14 (%) of all funds and portfolios of funds over the last 90 days. In spite of fairly weak fundamental indicators, Cohen Steers may actually be approaching a critical reversion point that can send shares even higher in January 2025.
Fidelity Advisor Energy 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

6 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Modest
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Fidelity Advisor Energy are ranked lower than 6 (%) of all funds and portfolios of funds over the last 90 days. In spite of fairly weak forward indicators, Fidelity Advisor may actually be approaching a critical reversion point that can send shares even higher in January 2025.

Cohen Steers and Fidelity Advisor Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with Cohen Steers and Fidelity Advisor

The main advantage of trading using opposite Cohen Steers and Fidelity Advisor positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Cohen Steers position performs unexpectedly, Fidelity Advisor can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Fidelity Advisor will offset losses from the drop in Fidelity Advisor's long position.
The idea behind Cohen Steers Mlp and Fidelity Advisor Energy pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Commodity Channel module to use Commodity Channel Index to analyze current equity momentum.

Other Complementary Tools

Piotroski F Score
Get Piotroski F Score based on the binary analysis strategy of nine different fundamentals
Theme Ratings
Determine theme ratings based on digital equity recommendations. Macroaxis theme ratings are based on combination of fundamental analysis and risk-adjusted market performance
Portfolio Optimization
Compute new portfolio that will generate highest expected return given your specified tolerance for risk
Financial Widgets
Easily integrated Macroaxis content with over 30 different plug-and-play financial widgets
Technical Analysis
Check basic technical indicators and analysis based on most latest market data