Correlation Between Madison Square and Reading International

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Madison Square and Reading International at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Madison Square and Reading International into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between Madison Square Garden and Reading International B, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Madison Square and Reading International and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Madison Square with a short position of Reading International. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Madison Square and Reading International.

Diversification Opportunities for Madison Square and Reading International

-0.23
  Correlation Coefficient

Very good diversification

The 3 months correlation between Madison and Reading is -0.23. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Madison Square Garden and Reading International B in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Reading International and Madison Square is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Madison Square Garden are associated (or correlated) with Reading International. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Reading International has no effect on the direction of Madison Square i.e., Madison Square and Reading International go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between Madison Square and Reading International

Given the investment horizon of 90 days Madison Square Garden is expected to generate 0.15 times more return on investment than Reading International. However, Madison Square Garden is 6.51 times less risky than Reading International. It trades about -0.12 of its potential returns per unit of risk. Reading International B is currently generating about -0.19 per unit of risk. If you would invest  22,568  in Madison Square Garden on November 1, 2024 and sell it today you would lose (508.00) from holding Madison Square Garden or give up 2.25% of portfolio value over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionMoves Against 
StrengthInsignificant
Accuracy95.0%
ValuesDaily Returns

Madison Square Garden  vs.  Reading International B

 Performance 
       Timeline  
Madison Square Garden 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

0 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Very Weak
Over the last 90 days Madison Square Garden has generated negative risk-adjusted returns adding no value to investors with long positions. In spite of comparatively stable technical and fundamental indicators, Madison Square is not utilizing all of its potentials. The latest stock price uproar, may contribute to short-horizon losses for the private investors.
Reading International 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

0 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Very Weak
Over the last 90 days Reading International B has generated negative risk-adjusted returns adding no value to investors with long positions. Despite somewhat strong forward indicators, Reading International is not utilizing all of its potentials. The latest stock price disturbance, may contribute to short-term losses for the investors.

Madison Square and Reading International Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with Madison Square and Reading International

The main advantage of trading using opposite Madison Square and Reading International positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Madison Square position performs unexpectedly, Reading International can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Reading International will offset losses from the drop in Reading International's long position.
The idea behind Madison Square Garden and Reading International B pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Watchlist Optimization module to optimize watchlists to build efficient portfolios or rebalance existing positions based on the mean-variance optimization algorithm.

Other Complementary Tools

Watchlist Optimization
Optimize watchlists to build efficient portfolios or rebalance existing positions based on the mean-variance optimization algorithm
FinTech Suite
Use AI to screen and filter profitable investment opportunities
Fundamental Analysis
View fundamental data based on most recent published financial statements
Stock Screener
Find equities using a custom stock filter or screen asymmetry in trading patterns, price, volume, or investment outlook.
Premium Stories
Follow Macroaxis premium stories from verified contributors across different equity types, categories and coverage scope