Correlation Between Research Affiliates and Matthews Emerging
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Research Affiliates and Matthews Emerging at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Research Affiliates and Matthews Emerging into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between Research Affiliates Deletions and Matthews Emerging Markets, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Research Affiliates and Matthews Emerging and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Research Affiliates with a short position of Matthews Emerging. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Research Affiliates and Matthews Emerging.
Diversification Opportunities for Research Affiliates and Matthews Emerging
-0.29 | Correlation Coefficient |
Very good diversification
The 3 months correlation between Research and Matthews is -0.29. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Research Affiliates Deletions and Matthews Emerging Markets in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Matthews Emerging Markets and Research Affiliates is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Research Affiliates Deletions are associated (or correlated) with Matthews Emerging. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Matthews Emerging Markets has no effect on the direction of Research Affiliates i.e., Research Affiliates and Matthews Emerging go up and down completely randomly.
Pair Corralation between Research Affiliates and Matthews Emerging
Given the investment horizon of 90 days Research Affiliates Deletions is expected to generate 1.46 times more return on investment than Matthews Emerging. However, Research Affiliates is 1.46 times more volatile than Matthews Emerging Markets. It trades about 0.12 of its potential returns per unit of risk. Matthews Emerging Markets is currently generating about -0.18 per unit of risk. If you would invest 2,594 in Research Affiliates Deletions on August 24, 2024 and sell it today you would earn a total of 88.00 from holding Research Affiliates Deletions or generate 3.39% return on investment over 90 days.
| Time Period | 3 Months [change] |
| Direction | Moves Against |
| Strength | Insignificant |
| Accuracy | 100.0% |
| Values | Daily Returns |
Research Affiliates Deletions vs. Matthews Emerging Markets
Performance |
| Timeline |
| Research Affiliates |
| Matthews Emerging Markets |
Research Affiliates and Matthews Emerging Volatility Contrast
Predicted Return Density |
| Returns |
Pair Trading with Research Affiliates and Matthews Emerging
The main advantage of trading using opposite Research Affiliates and Matthews Emerging positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Research Affiliates position performs unexpectedly, Matthews Emerging can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Matthews Emerging will offset losses from the drop in Matthews Emerging's long position.| Research Affiliates vs. Vanguard Mid Cap Value | Research Affiliates vs. SPDR SP Dividend | Research Affiliates vs. iShares Russell Mid Cap | Research Affiliates vs. Pacer Cash Cows |
| Matthews Emerging vs. Invesco PureBeta MSCI | Matthews Emerging vs. Aquagold International | Matthews Emerging vs. Morningstar Unconstrained Allocation | Matthews Emerging vs. High Yield Municipal Fund |
Check out your portfolio center.Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Portfolio Backtesting module to avoid under-diversification and over-optimization by backtesting your portfolios.
Other Complementary Tools
| My Watchlist Analysis Analyze my current watchlist and to refresh optimization strategy. Macroaxis watchlist is based on self-learning algorithm to remember stocks you like | |
| Price Exposure Probability Analyze equity upside and downside potential for a given time horizon across multiple markets | |
| Price Transformation Use Price Transformation models to analyze the depth of different equity instruments across global markets | |
| Options Analysis Analyze and evaluate options and option chains as a potential hedge for your portfolios | |
| Stock Tickers Use high-impact, comprehensive, and customizable stock tickers that can be easily integrated to any websites |