Correlation Between Oklahoma Municipal and Federated Clover

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Oklahoma Municipal and Federated Clover at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Oklahoma Municipal and Federated Clover into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between Oklahoma Municipal Fund and Federated Clover Small, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Oklahoma Municipal and Federated Clover and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Oklahoma Municipal with a short position of Federated Clover. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Oklahoma Municipal and Federated Clover.

Diversification Opportunities for Oklahoma Municipal and Federated Clover

-0.28
  Correlation Coefficient

Very good diversification

The 3 months correlation between Oklahoma and Federated is -0.28. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Oklahoma Municipal Fund and Federated Clover Small in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Federated Clover Small and Oklahoma Municipal is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Oklahoma Municipal Fund are associated (or correlated) with Federated Clover. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Federated Clover Small has no effect on the direction of Oklahoma Municipal i.e., Oklahoma Municipal and Federated Clover go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between Oklahoma Municipal and Federated Clover

Assuming the 90 days horizon Oklahoma Municipal is expected to generate 5.36 times less return on investment than Federated Clover. But when comparing it to its historical volatility, Oklahoma Municipal Fund is 4.94 times less risky than Federated Clover. It trades about 0.04 of its potential returns per unit of risk. Federated Clover Small is currently generating about 0.05 of returns per unit of risk over similar time horizon. If you would invest  2,285  in Federated Clover Small on August 30, 2024 and sell it today you would earn a total of  638.00  from holding Federated Clover Small or generate 27.92% return on investment over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionMoves Against 
StrengthInsignificant
Accuracy100.0%
ValuesDaily Returns

Oklahoma Municipal Fund  vs.  Federated Clover Small

 Performance 
       Timeline  
Oklahoma Municipal 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

2 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Insignificant
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Oklahoma Municipal Fund are ranked lower than 2 (%) of all funds and portfolios of funds over the last 90 days. In spite of fairly strong basic indicators, Oklahoma Municipal is not utilizing all of its potentials. The current stock price disturbance, may contribute to short-term losses for the investors.
Federated Clover Small 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

7 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
OK
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Federated Clover Small are ranked lower than 7 (%) of all funds and portfolios of funds over the last 90 days. In spite of fairly weak basic indicators, Federated Clover may actually be approaching a critical reversion point that can send shares even higher in December 2024.

Oklahoma Municipal and Federated Clover Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with Oklahoma Municipal and Federated Clover

The main advantage of trading using opposite Oklahoma Municipal and Federated Clover positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Oklahoma Municipal position performs unexpectedly, Federated Clover can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Federated Clover will offset losses from the drop in Federated Clover's long position.
The idea behind Oklahoma Municipal Fund and Federated Clover Small pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Portfolio Diagnostics module to use generated alerts and portfolio events aggregator to diagnose current holdings.

Other Complementary Tools

Share Portfolio
Track or share privately all of your investments from the convenience of any device
Piotroski F Score
Get Piotroski F Score based on the binary analysis strategy of nine different fundamentals
Commodity Channel
Use Commodity Channel Index to analyze current equity momentum
Instant Ratings
Determine any equity ratings based on digital recommendations. Macroaxis instant equity ratings are based on combination of fundamental analysis and risk-adjusted market performance
Watchlist Optimization
Optimize watchlists to build efficient portfolios or rebalance existing positions based on the mean-variance optimization algorithm