Correlation Between Okta and China Infrastructure
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Okta and China Infrastructure at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Okta and China Infrastructure into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between Okta Inc and China Infrastructure Construction, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Okta and China Infrastructure and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Okta with a short position of China Infrastructure. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Okta and China Infrastructure.
Diversification Opportunities for Okta and China Infrastructure
0.48 | Correlation Coefficient |
Very weak diversification
The 3 months correlation between Okta and China is 0.48. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Okta Inc and China Infrastructure Construct in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on China Infrastructure and Okta is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Okta Inc are associated (or correlated) with China Infrastructure. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of China Infrastructure has no effect on the direction of Okta i.e., Okta and China Infrastructure go up and down completely randomly.
Pair Corralation between Okta and China Infrastructure
Given the investment horizon of 90 days Okta is expected to generate 1.42 times less return on investment than China Infrastructure. But when comparing it to its historical volatility, Okta Inc is 4.34 times less risky than China Infrastructure. It trades about 0.03 of its potential returns per unit of risk. China Infrastructure Construction is currently generating about 0.01 of returns per unit of risk over similar time horizon. If you would invest 0.11 in China Infrastructure Construction on August 29, 2024 and sell it today you would lose (0.07) from holding China Infrastructure Construction or give up 63.64% of portfolio value over 90 days.
| Time Period | 3 Months [change] |
| Direction | Moves Together |
| Strength | Weak |
| Accuracy | 31.52% |
| Values | Daily Returns |
Okta Inc vs. China Infrastructure Construct
Performance |
| Timeline |
| Okta Inc |
| China Infrastructure |
Risk-Adjusted Performance
0 of 100
Weak | Strong |
Very Weak
Okta and China Infrastructure Volatility Contrast
Predicted Return Density |
| Returns |
Pair Trading with Okta and China Infrastructure
The main advantage of trading using opposite Okta and China Infrastructure positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Okta position performs unexpectedly, China Infrastructure can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in China Infrastructure will offset losses from the drop in China Infrastructure's long position.The idea behind Okta Inc and China Infrastructure Construction pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.| China Infrastructure vs. Medicine Man Technologies | China Infrastructure vs. Kona Gold Solutions | China Infrastructure vs. Green Thumb Industries | China Infrastructure vs. Cann American Corp |
Check out your portfolio center.Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Sync Your Broker module to sync your existing holdings, watchlists, positions or portfolios from thousands of online brokerage services, banks, investment account aggregators and robo-advisors..
Other Complementary Tools
| Funds Screener Find actively-traded funds from around the world traded on over 30 global exchanges | |
| Earnings Calls Check upcoming earnings announcements updated hourly across public exchanges | |
| Portfolio Diagnostics Use generated alerts and portfolio events aggregator to diagnose current holdings | |
| Portfolio Analyzer Portfolio analysis module that provides access to portfolio diagnostics and optimization engine | |
| Companies Directory Evaluate performance of over 100,000 Stocks, Funds, and ETFs against different fundamentals |