Correlation Between Pitney Bowes and Radiant Logistics

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Pitney Bowes and Radiant Logistics at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Pitney Bowes and Radiant Logistics into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between Pitney Bowes NT and Radiant Logistics, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Pitney Bowes and Radiant Logistics and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Pitney Bowes with a short position of Radiant Logistics. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Pitney Bowes and Radiant Logistics.

Diversification Opportunities for Pitney Bowes and Radiant Logistics

0.67
  Correlation Coefficient

Poor diversification

The 3 months correlation between Pitney and Radiant is 0.67. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Pitney Bowes NT and Radiant Logistics in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Radiant Logistics and Pitney Bowes is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Pitney Bowes NT are associated (or correlated) with Radiant Logistics. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Radiant Logistics has no effect on the direction of Pitney Bowes i.e., Pitney Bowes and Radiant Logistics go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between Pitney Bowes and Radiant Logistics

Assuming the 90 days trading horizon Pitney Bowes NT is expected to under-perform the Radiant Logistics. But the preferred stock apears to be less risky and, when comparing its historical volatility, Pitney Bowes NT is 1.79 times less risky than Radiant Logistics. The preferred stock trades about -0.07 of its potential returns per unit of risk. The Radiant Logistics is currently generating about 0.16 of returns per unit of risk over similar time horizon. If you would invest  677.00  in Radiant Logistics on August 30, 2024 and sell it today you would earn a total of  63.00  from holding Radiant Logistics or generate 9.31% return on investment over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionMoves Together 
StrengthSignificant
Accuracy100.0%
ValuesDaily Returns

Pitney Bowes NT  vs.  Radiant Logistics

 Performance 
       Timeline  
Pitney Bowes NT 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

9 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
OK
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Pitney Bowes NT are ranked lower than 9 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. Despite somewhat unsteady forward indicators, Pitney Bowes may actually be approaching a critical reversion point that can send shares even higher in December 2024.
Radiant Logistics 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

8 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
OK
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Radiant Logistics are ranked lower than 8 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. In spite of comparatively uncertain technical and fundamental indicators, Radiant Logistics unveiled solid returns over the last few months and may actually be approaching a breakup point.

Pitney Bowes and Radiant Logistics Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with Pitney Bowes and Radiant Logistics

The main advantage of trading using opposite Pitney Bowes and Radiant Logistics positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Pitney Bowes position performs unexpectedly, Radiant Logistics can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Radiant Logistics will offset losses from the drop in Radiant Logistics' long position.
The idea behind Pitney Bowes NT and Radiant Logistics pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the CEOs Directory module to screen CEOs from public companies around the world.

Other Complementary Tools

Funds Screener
Find actively-traded funds from around the world traded on over 30 global exchanges
Pattern Recognition
Use different Pattern Recognition models to time the market across multiple global exchanges
Portfolio Volatility
Check portfolio volatility and analyze historical return density to properly model market risk
Financial Widgets
Easily integrated Macroaxis content with over 30 different plug-and-play financial widgets
Stock Tickers
Use high-impact, comprehensive, and customizable stock tickers that can be easily integrated to any websites