Correlation Between Park City and GetSwift Technologies
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Park City and GetSwift Technologies at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Park City and GetSwift Technologies into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between Park City Group and GetSwift Technologies Limited, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Park City and GetSwift Technologies and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Park City with a short position of GetSwift Technologies. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Park City and GetSwift Technologies.
Diversification Opportunities for Park City and GetSwift Technologies
0.0 | Correlation Coefficient |
Pay attention - limited upside
The 3 months correlation between Park and GetSwift is 0.0. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Park City Group and GetSwift Technologies Limited in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on GetSwift Technologies and Park City is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Park City Group are associated (or correlated) with GetSwift Technologies. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of GetSwift Technologies has no effect on the direction of Park City i.e., Park City and GetSwift Technologies go up and down completely randomly.
Pair Corralation between Park City and GetSwift Technologies
Given the investment horizon of 90 days Park City is expected to generate 22.28 times less return on investment than GetSwift Technologies. But when comparing it to its historical volatility, Park City Group is 33.48 times less risky than GetSwift Technologies. It trades about 0.2 of its potential returns per unit of risk. GetSwift Technologies Limited is currently generating about 0.13 of returns per unit of risk over similar time horizon. If you would invest 2.00 in GetSwift Technologies Limited on September 3, 2024 and sell it today you would lose (1.99) from holding GetSwift Technologies Limited or give up 99.5% of portfolio value over 90 days.
| Time Period | 3 Months [change] |
| Direction | Flat |
| Strength | Insignificant |
| Accuracy | 92.81% |
| Values | Daily Returns |
Park City Group vs. GetSwift Technologies Limited
Performance |
| Timeline |
| Park City Group |
Risk-Adjusted Performance
0 of 100
Weak | Strong |
Very Weak
| GetSwift Technologies |
Risk-Adjusted Performance
0 of 100
Weak | Strong |
Very Weak
Park City and GetSwift Technologies Volatility Contrast
Predicted Return Density |
| Returns |
Pair Trading with Park City and GetSwift Technologies
The main advantage of trading using opposite Park City and GetSwift Technologies positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Park City position performs unexpectedly, GetSwift Technologies can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in GetSwift Technologies will offset losses from the drop in GetSwift Technologies' long position.| Park City vs. Red Violet | Park City vs. Issuer Direct Corp | Park City vs. Research Solutions | Park City vs. Rayont Inc |
| GetSwift Technologies vs. Coupang LLC | GetSwift Technologies vs. Grocery Outlet Holding | GetSwift Technologies vs. Titan Machinery | GetSwift Technologies vs. FitLife Brands, Common |
Check out your portfolio center.Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Insider Screener module to find insiders across different sectors to evaluate their impact on performance.
Other Complementary Tools
| AI Portfolio Architect Use AI to generate optimal portfolios and find profitable investment opportunities | |
| Balance Of Power Check stock momentum by analyzing Balance Of Power indicator and other technical ratios | |
| Fundamentals Comparison Compare fundamentals across multiple equities to find investing opportunities | |
| Bond Analysis Evaluate and analyze corporate bonds as a potential investment for your portfolios. | |
| ETFs Find actively traded Exchange Traded Funds (ETF) from around the world |