Correlation Between Public Service and CMS Energy

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Public Service and CMS Energy at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Public Service and CMS Energy into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between Public Service Enterprise and CMS Energy, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Public Service and CMS Energy and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Public Service with a short position of CMS Energy. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Public Service and CMS Energy.

Diversification Opportunities for Public Service and CMS Energy

0.7
  Correlation Coefficient

Poor diversification

The 3 months correlation between Public and CMS is 0.7. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Public Service Enterprise and CMS Energy in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on CMS Energy and Public Service is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Public Service Enterprise are associated (or correlated) with CMS Energy. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of CMS Energy has no effect on the direction of Public Service i.e., Public Service and CMS Energy go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between Public Service and CMS Energy

Considering the 90-day investment horizon Public Service Enterprise is expected to generate 1.04 times more return on investment than CMS Energy. However, Public Service is 1.04 times more volatile than CMS Energy. It trades about 0.09 of its potential returns per unit of risk. CMS Energy is currently generating about 0.04 per unit of risk. If you would invest  5,611  in Public Service Enterprise on August 24, 2024 and sell it today you would earn a total of  3,624  from holding Public Service Enterprise or generate 64.59% return on investment over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionMoves Together 
StrengthSignificant
Accuracy100.0%
ValuesDaily Returns

Public Service Enterprise  vs.  CMS Energy

 Performance 
       Timeline  
Public Service Enterprise 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

12 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Good
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Public Service Enterprise are ranked lower than 12 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. Despite nearly weak technical and fundamental indicators, Public Service reported solid returns over the last few months and may actually be approaching a breakup point.
CMS Energy 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

4 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Insignificant
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in CMS Energy are ranked lower than 4 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. In spite of comparatively stable primary indicators, CMS Energy is not utilizing all of its potentials. The latest stock price uproar, may contribute to short-horizon losses for the private investors.

Public Service and CMS Energy Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with Public Service and CMS Energy

The main advantage of trading using opposite Public Service and CMS Energy positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Public Service position performs unexpectedly, CMS Energy can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in CMS Energy will offset losses from the drop in CMS Energy's long position.
The idea behind Public Service Enterprise and CMS Energy pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Fundamentals Comparison module to compare fundamentals across multiple equities to find investing opportunities.

Other Complementary Tools

Price Transformation
Use Price Transformation models to analyze the depth of different equity instruments across global markets
Insider Screener
Find insiders across different sectors to evaluate their impact on performance
Commodity Directory
Find actively traded commodities issued by global exchanges
Equity Analysis
Research over 250,000 global equities including funds, stocks and ETFs to find investment opportunities
Technical Analysis
Check basic technical indicators and analysis based on most latest market data