Correlation Between PennantPark Floating and Nomura Holdings

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both PennantPark Floating and Nomura Holdings at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining PennantPark Floating and Nomura Holdings into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between PennantPark Floating Rate and Nomura Holdings ADR, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on PennantPark Floating and Nomura Holdings and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in PennantPark Floating with a short position of Nomura Holdings. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of PennantPark Floating and Nomura Holdings.

Diversification Opportunities for PennantPark Floating and Nomura Holdings

-0.54
  Correlation Coefficient

Excellent diversification

The 3 months correlation between PennantPark and Nomura is -0.54. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding PennantPark Floating Rate and Nomura Holdings ADR in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Nomura Holdings ADR and PennantPark Floating is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on PennantPark Floating Rate are associated (or correlated) with Nomura Holdings. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Nomura Holdings ADR has no effect on the direction of PennantPark Floating i.e., PennantPark Floating and Nomura Holdings go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between PennantPark Floating and Nomura Holdings

Given the investment horizon of 90 days PennantPark Floating is expected to generate 3.91 times less return on investment than Nomura Holdings. But when comparing it to its historical volatility, PennantPark Floating Rate is 2.44 times less risky than Nomura Holdings. It trades about 0.05 of its potential returns per unit of risk. Nomura Holdings ADR is currently generating about 0.08 of returns per unit of risk over similar time horizon. If you would invest  410.00  in Nomura Holdings ADR on August 25, 2024 and sell it today you would earn a total of  195.00  from holding Nomura Holdings ADR or generate 47.56% return on investment over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionMoves Against 
StrengthVery Weak
Accuracy100.0%
ValuesDaily Returns

PennantPark Floating Rate  vs.  Nomura Holdings ADR

 Performance 
       Timeline  
PennantPark Floating Rate 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

4 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Insignificant
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in PennantPark Floating Rate are ranked lower than 4 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. In spite of comparatively stable essential indicators, PennantPark Floating is not utilizing all of its potentials. The recent stock price uproar, may contribute to short-horizon losses for the private investors.
Nomura Holdings ADR 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

3 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Insignificant
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Nomura Holdings ADR are ranked lower than 3 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. Even with relatively invariable primary indicators, Nomura Holdings is not utilizing all of its potentials. The latest stock price agitation, may contribute to short-term losses for the retail investors.

PennantPark Floating and Nomura Holdings Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with PennantPark Floating and Nomura Holdings

The main advantage of trading using opposite PennantPark Floating and Nomura Holdings positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if PennantPark Floating position performs unexpectedly, Nomura Holdings can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Nomura Holdings will offset losses from the drop in Nomura Holdings' long position.
The idea behind PennantPark Floating Rate and Nomura Holdings ADR pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the USA ETFs module to find actively traded Exchange Traded Funds (ETF) in USA.

Other Complementary Tools

Global Markets Map
Get a quick overview of global market snapshot using zoomable world map. Drill down to check world indexes
Portfolio Rebalancing
Analyze risk-adjusted returns against different time horizons to find asset-allocation targets
AI Portfolio Architect
Use AI to generate optimal portfolios and find profitable investment opportunities
Transaction History
View history of all your transactions and understand their impact on performance
Watchlist Optimization
Optimize watchlists to build efficient portfolios or rebalance existing positions based on the mean-variance optimization algorithm