Correlation Between Procter Gamble and Chevron Corp

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Procter Gamble and Chevron Corp at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Procter Gamble and Chevron Corp into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between Procter Gamble DRC and Chevron Corp CEDEAR, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Procter Gamble and Chevron Corp and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Procter Gamble with a short position of Chevron Corp. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Procter Gamble and Chevron Corp.

Diversification Opportunities for Procter Gamble and Chevron Corp

0.08
  Correlation Coefficient

Significant diversification

The 3 months correlation between Procter and Chevron is 0.08. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Procter Gamble DRC and Chevron Corp CEDEAR in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Chevron Corp CEDEAR and Procter Gamble is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Procter Gamble DRC are associated (or correlated) with Chevron Corp. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Chevron Corp CEDEAR has no effect on the direction of Procter Gamble i.e., Procter Gamble and Chevron Corp go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between Procter Gamble and Chevron Corp

Assuming the 90 days horizon Procter Gamble DRC is expected to under-perform the Chevron Corp. But the stock apears to be less risky and, when comparing its historical volatility, Procter Gamble DRC is 1.05 times less risky than Chevron Corp. The stock trades about -0.09 of its potential returns per unit of risk. The Chevron Corp CEDEAR is currently generating about -0.01 of returns per unit of risk over similar time horizon. If you would invest  1,180,000  in Chevron Corp CEDEAR on November 2, 2024 and sell it today you would lose (22,500) from holding Chevron Corp CEDEAR or give up 1.91% of portfolio value over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionMoves Together 
StrengthInsignificant
Accuracy100.0%
ValuesDaily Returns

Procter Gamble DRC  vs.  Chevron Corp CEDEAR

 Performance 
       Timeline  
Procter Gamble DRC 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

1 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Weak
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Procter Gamble DRC are ranked lower than 1 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. Despite somewhat strong fundamental drivers, Procter Gamble is not utilizing all of its potentials. The current stock price disturbance, may contribute to short-term losses for the investors.
Chevron Corp CEDEAR 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

2 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Weak
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Chevron Corp CEDEAR are ranked lower than 2 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. Despite somewhat strong basic indicators, Chevron Corp is not utilizing all of its potentials. The current stock price disturbance, may contribute to short-term losses for the investors.

Procter Gamble and Chevron Corp Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with Procter Gamble and Chevron Corp

The main advantage of trading using opposite Procter Gamble and Chevron Corp positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Procter Gamble position performs unexpectedly, Chevron Corp can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Chevron Corp will offset losses from the drop in Chevron Corp's long position.
The idea behind Procter Gamble DRC and Chevron Corp CEDEAR pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Piotroski F Score module to get Piotroski F Score based on the binary analysis strategy of nine different fundamentals.

Other Complementary Tools

Equity Forecasting
Use basic forecasting models to generate price predictions and determine price momentum
Price Ceiling Movement
Calculate and plot Price Ceiling Movement for different equity instruments
Share Portfolio
Track or share privately all of your investments from the convenience of any device
Analyst Advice
Analyst recommendations and target price estimates broken down by several categories
Stock Screener
Find equities using a custom stock filter or screen asymmetry in trading patterns, price, volume, or investment outlook.